Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*vacuum\s+advance\/retard\s+differences\?\s+Ha\s+Ha\!\s+Zero\!\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Fw: vacuum advance/retard differences? Ha Ha! Zero! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:26:48 -0400
The only time an engine is at 'zero' efficiency is when you switch it OFF! You either have a 'working process' that has an efficiency index... or 'no process' at all. Paul Tegler ptegler@gouldfo.com
/html/triumphs/2001-09/msg00821.html (9,177 bytes)

2. Re: vacuum advance/retard differences? Ha Ha! Zero! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:50:05 -0400
Message text written by "Ptegler" You either have a 'working process' that has an efficiency index... or 'no process' at all. < Again, the purpose of an engine is propulsion. If the engine is not pro
/html/triumphs/2001-09/msg00825.html (8,312 bytes)

3. Re: vacuum advance/retard differences? Ha Ha! Zero! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:48:04 -0400
AAhhh.... well then a gasoline engine is ALWAYS at ZERO efficiency. -orYou'd have to say an engine is 'super-duper efficient' at it's supposed task. What energy is 'going in'??? gasoline as a fuel i
/html/triumphs/2001-09/msg00835.html (10,644 bytes)

4. Re: vacuum advance/retard differences? Ha Ha! Zero! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:35:50 -0400
Message text written by "Ptegler" gasoline as a fuel is not 'energy in' . The engine has to 'work' to burn a fuel < The energy in is the chemical energy contained in the fuel. When you oxidize gasoli
/html/triumphs/2001-09/msg00837.html (9,097 bytes)

5. Re: vacuum advance/retard differences? Ha Ha! Zero! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:05:40 +0200
Dave , Is it energetically efficient trying to compress water ? Cheers Mike /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with
/html/triumphs/2001-09/msg00852.html (8,139 bytes)

6. Re: vacuum advance/retard differences? Ha Ha! Zero! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:56:30 -0400
Message text written by "Mike Kitchener" Is it energetically efficient trying to compress water ? < Good point. I meant to say "pressurize water." Dave /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list /// To
/html/triumphs/2001-09/msg00876.html (7,967 bytes)

7. RE: vacuum advance/retard differences? Ha Ha! Zero! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 16:12:33 -0400
Fill a balloon with water. place a small rock on top of the balloon. The weight of the rock is compressing the water. (ridiculously small amount, but nevertheless the separation of molecules is less
/html/triumphs/2001-09/msg00882.html (9,078 bytes)

8. RE: vacuum advance/retard differences? Ha Ha! Zero! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:44:19 -0400
Message text written by Mike Kitchener weight of the rock is compressing the water. (ridiculously small amount, but nevertheless the separation of molecules is less). (use a piston and a rock if the
/html/triumphs/2001-09/msg00886.html (9,117 bytes)

9. RE: vacuum advance/retard differences? Ha Ha! Zero! (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 09:56:43 +0200
Hey Dave I didn't write that!! My back gives out just filling the balloons with water . Not getting any younger. Mike /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text me
/html/triumphs/2001-09/msg00892.html (7,809 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu