Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*velocity\s+stacks\s+and\s+stand\-off\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*velocity\s+stacks\s+and\s+stand\-off\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. velocity stacks and stand-off (score: 1): Author: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 20:56:55 -0700; While we were dynoing this 3/4 race engine (280 degree duration cam) installing the velocity stacks in every case made the fuel "stand-off" disappear. Without the velocity stacks there was a cloud of; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00088.html (9,484 bytes)
2. Re: velocity stacks and stand-off (score: 1): Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:37:22 -0700; That's pretty interesting. I might make note that the higher revs the higher the air velocity the higher the velocity the lower the pressure, therefore the flow of fuel will be HIGHER even though the; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00089.html (10,451 bytes)
3. RE: velocity stacks and stand-off (score: 1): Author: "Randall Young" <Ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 23:40:14 -0700; IOW, when the piston hits the top of it's travel, you suddenly have a fixed venturi with a fixed jet ... just like a real carb <g> Randall; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00090.html (8,105 bytes)
4. RE: velocity stacks and stand-off (score: 1): Author: "tstrange@new.rr.com" <tstrange@new.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 05:06:50 -0400; Just wondering; what was the shape of the outside lip on the stacks you used. They should be rounded back toward the outside of the stack (fully radiused). If these happened to be of the variety wit; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00091.html (10,869 bytes)
5. Re: velocity stacks and stand-off (score: 1): Author: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 20:11:49 -0700; But with no method of preventing over enrichment like the air corrector jet on a Weber! Greg Solow -- Original Message -- From: "Randall Young" <Ryoung@navcomtech.com> To: "Friends of Triumph" <fot@a; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00093.html (8,807 bytes)
6. Re: velocity stacks and stand-off (score: 1): Author: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 20:29:49 -0700; The "parabolic" velocity stacks have an extremely large radius bell that flares out a full 90 degrees but does not roll back on iteself. The outside diameter where the edge of the bell ends is 3 5/8"; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00094.html (12,878 bytes)
7. Re: velocity stacks and stand-off (score: 1): Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 08:46:41 -0700; The early velocity stacks that I did had a sharp edge and no roll back of the outer edge. They did not make the big difference that we achieved later with a rolled over edge. In tests we found the in; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00099.html (8,220 bytes)
8. Re: velocity stacks and stand-off (score: 1): Author: Gt6steve@aol.com; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:37:33 EDT; You've got to know by now that interest is demonstrated any time you speak. Please, explain away... Steve << I'll explain our tests another time if interest is demonstrated. It's no big deal.; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00100.html (8,041 bytes)
9. Re: velocity stacks and stand-off (score: 1): Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:24:49 -0700; I added the FOT folks into this as some might be interested in this stuff. I made a cam unit for the back of the distributor. I milled it out of a block of aluminum and made a cam that was 2" in diam; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00102.html (12,927 bytes)
10. Re: velocity stacks and stand-off (score: 1): Author: "MARK J WEATHERS" <markjwea@email.msn.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 02:44:15 -0700; I would be interested in teh details. Mark 72 TR6 -- Original Message -- From: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net> To: <fot@autox.team.net> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 8:46 AM Subject: Re: velocity s; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00106.html (8,643 bytes)
11. RE: velocity stacks and stand-off (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:33:30 -0700; If you look at the injectors on most of the new racing motorcycles you'll see them mounted as you describe--they are completely outside the stack on a little frame as much as five inches from the mou; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00112.html (8,259 bytes)
12. RE: velocity stacks and stand-off (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:30:43 -0400 (EDT); Is this setup considered an "annular discharge" type fuel system? I ask because the SCCA Solo II rules have a bunch of references to annular discharge carbs being not-legal. I'm just curious. rml --; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00114.html (8,848 bytes)
13. Re: velocity stacks and stand-off (score: 1): Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:40:34 -0700; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00115.html (8,510 bytes)
14. RE: velocity stacks and stand-off (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 13:14:47 -0700; Beats me, but it sounds like a painful and embarrassing condition. Is this setup considered an "annular discharge" type fuel system? I ask because the SCCA Solo II rules have a bunch of references to; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00117.html (8,920 bytes)
15. Re: velocity stacks and stand-off (score: 1): Author: "Michael D. Porter" <mporter@zianet.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 03:12:20 -0600; Doesn't it, though.... But, in answer to the Bobstah's question, as I recall, an annular discharge carb has many small outlets around the circumference of the throat. Holley used to make a downdraft; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00120.html (8,275 bytes)
16. RE: velocity stacks and stand-off (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 14:06:14 -0700; Salesman tossing and annular discharge have a great deal in common. Doesn't it, though.... But, in answer to the Bobstah's question, as I recall, an annular discharge carb has many small outlets arou; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00121.html (8,433 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]