- 1. Re: wandering track/chutes (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
- Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 19:52:56 -0500
- I do the same thing Doug.... just makes sense to me to save that ordeal for an emergency..... the other side of this is that I didn't get down to the big end under power this last time out..... Hmmm
- /html/land-speed/2001-09/msg00019.html (9,184 bytes)
- 2. Re: wandering track/chutes (score: 1)
- Author: "glen barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>
- Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 18:38:09 -0700
- OK Keith & Doug I am a believer in always using the chute. Some time things are going on that the driver doesn't know about. I know they are a pain to keep clean and pack. I especially would like to
- /html/land-speed/2001-09/msg00021.html (10,226 bytes)
- 3. Re: wandering track/chutes (score: 1)
- Author: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 11:06:53 EDT
- Dave, A new car really gets a thorough going-over the first time thru Tech. Any new driver has the Tech with the car he (or she) is going to drive. This includes a pretty comprehensive "car-orientati
- /html/land-speed/2001-09/msg00025.html (9,593 bytes)
- 4. Re: wandering track/chutes (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 11:48:06 -0400
- I guess what i was trying to say is a new car as much as a new driver. Even if the driver is experienced the car may not be. An example would be a new aircraft. Even though they are designed by the b
- /html/land-speed/2001-09/msg00026.html (10,492 bytes)
- 5. Re: wandering track/chutes (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Byrnes" <Rick@rbmotorsports.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 12:42:36 -0400
- Dave is correct in his thoughts about new cars. I have been thinking about just that lately since I am doing a new deal. In addition to a lot of scrutiny in Tech, we do need to work up in speeds. Thi
- /html/land-speed/2001-09/msg00027.html (7,843 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu