Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*was\s+Is\s+A\-stock\s+soft\?\s+now\s+BS\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*was\s+Is\s+A\-stock\s+soft\?\s+now\s+BS\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: was Is A-stock soft? now BS? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <teamnet@hedlygoeke.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 15:11:15 -0700; I think it's mostly course dependancy. Yes the S2000 is tricker to go fast in, but that make's it more fun also :-). Andy Mckee and I both have expereince in both, and while we like the S2000, we bo; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00079.html (9,462 bytes)
2. Re: was Is A-stock soft? now BS? (score: 1): Author: Steven Volpp <volpp@netdoor.com>; Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 18:37:25 -0500; I agree with Joe. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00080.html (10,724 bytes)
3. Re: was Is A-stock soft? now BS? (score: 1): Author: "David W. James" <vnend@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 19:49:20 -0400; A-stock, not B-Stock? :-) David -- David W. James vnendNOSPAM@adelphia.net Remove spam block to send email. "Ignorance is the mother of adventure." Hagar the Horrible /// unsubscribe/change address r; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00082.html (8,286 bytes)
4. Re: was Is A-stock soft? now BS? (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 03:11:22 -0500; -- Original Message -- == Really? I would've thought the rear engine arrangement of the Boxster would lend itself well to the Pro format as it does with the MR2s. Eric Linnhoff in KC '98 Dodge Neon R; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00085.html (8,250 bytes)
5. Re: was Is A-stock soft? now BS? (score: 1): Author: David Hedderick <davebs14@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 13:34:18 -0700 (PDT); My interpretation is that if there were more people running 968's (Faulkner, Murrary, etc.) then they would be competitive with the Boxster and the S2000. That's at least my opinion. :-) David Yahoo!; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00088.html (9,484 bytes)
6. Re: was Is A-stock soft? now BS? (score: 1): Author: David Hedderick <davebs14@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 13:37:49 -0700 (PDT); Nope. Mine is an evil SOB to launch. At the pro if I launched it too soft the car would bog, if I slipped the %$@! out of the clutch it would launch decently, and if I dropped it at 6k (which I ended; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00089.html (9,527 bytes)
7. Re: was Is A-stock soft? now BS? (score: 1): Author: Topper Jones <gbrt@rocketmail.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 13:42:18 -0700 (PDT); I agree with David. I think the main reason the S2000's are winning is that there are so many of them running and most of the "good" drivers bought them. Of course there was a reason they bought them; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00090.html (8,509 bytes)
8. Re: was Is A-stock soft? now BS? (score: 1): Author: "Brad Holliday" <bradholliday@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 01:04:22 +0000; I think BS is a great class this year and the participation proves it. So, "fixing" it may not be a good idea. However, for those of us that own slow BS cars (I own a MR2, but am driving a S2000), t; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00094.html (8,840 bytes)
9. Re: was Is A-stock soft? now BS? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <teamnet@hedlygoeke.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 18:13:04 -0700; Yes, you would think the mid engine Boxster would launch well, but after running one a whole season, it was found very hard to launch. It tends to spin and hop instead of hookup, like the MR2 and 911; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00095.html (9,583 bytes)
10. Re: was Is A-stock soft? now BS? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <teamnet@hedlygoeke.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 18:53:26 -0700; The only problem with this is you are mixing apples and oranges, as in cars of totally different types. It's the duck theory. You don't see CS Miata's with FS Camero's together do you? There is a lo; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00096.html (8,754 bytes)
11. Re: was Is A-stock soft? now BS? (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 20:21:30 EDT; Bingo! We have a WINNAH!!! This was my point exactly at yesterday's SEB meeting! CHD /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinf; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00101.html (7,791 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]