Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*wasting\s+gates\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*wasting\s+gates\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: wasting gates (score: 1): Author: Chris Sims <csims@simshome.com>; Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 09:30:57 -0700 (PDT); <snip> <Lot's of speculation> I care to know! For two reasons: A. If there is a magic way to make more power from my SVO I'd love to know. B. (More on topic) I think the whole point of all these rule; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00000.html (8,897 bytes)
2. Re: wasting gates (score: 1): Author: Mark Todd <marktodd@internet8.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 08:40:42 -0700; I'd love to see you build such an animal as you describe. As soon as people start doing this and the SVO dominates whichever class it's currently in -- reclass it! Exactly. The SCCA's mindset would b; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00009.html (7,823 bytes)
3. Re: wasting gates (score: 1): Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 09:39:14 -0700; This thread isn't stirring up a lot of interest, but I'm still interested, so here goes: (PS -- that's the CCaannaaddiiaann spelling of "Nichols" <grin>.) I was really making a personal note about au; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00011.html (11,302 bytes)
4. Re: wasting gates (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 09:51:48 -0400; I'm back from the weekend, and rather than reply to _every_ letter in this thread that I missed, I'm going to summerize here: This is a silly point of semantics, but it's an _important_ silly point o; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00038.html (11,791 bytes)
5. Re: wasting gates (score: 1): Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 07:03:30 -0700; Good post. However, two points (listed as one) are deserving of correction from a technical standpoint: the and Boths of these points are misperceptions in and of themselves, and worth clarifying for; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00040.html (8,554 bytes)
6. Re: wasting gates (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 10:55:59 -0400; This much we can agree on, right? where you're full throttle, and there's still lag to deal >> with. Well, yeas and no - it's car-dependant. always achieved on the even the shortest straights I've >; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00046.html (8,529 bytes)
7. Re: wasting gates (score: 1): Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 08:08:58 -0700; We can agree on that. That's why I keep saying things like this: because I understand that (and you maybe thought I kept repeating the word "SVO" to brag, huh?) <grin> curve look like on this car? F; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00049.html (8,952 bytes)
8. Re: wasting gates (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 13:37:36 -0400; down (the gauge reads to 21 psi). Is this a stock gauge, or an aftermarket gauge? Electric or manual? The reason I ask is because the Talon's factory boost gauge reports pure fiction. According to i; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00069.html (9,243 bytes)
9. RE: wasting gates (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 13:19:17 -0500; -- Exactly the same on the StealthTT/VR4. The boost guage is a simple calculation done by the ECU using the AFM output, and RPM. It makes no corrections for wastegate loss..etc. Toyota's boost guage; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00073.html (8,106 bytes)
10. Re: wasting gates (score: 1): Author: "Mac Crossett" <macross@gte.net>; Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 23:22:51 -0500; Ok, I'll throw my $.02 in... it. factory It's definitely the compressor. The T25 compressor wheel maxes out at around 25lb/min, according to Garrett (something like 325cfm). Working on some partially; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00115.html (9,601 bytes)
11. Re: wasting gates (score: 1): Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 21:48:07 -0700; Our math agrees completely on this -- my target is 10 and I'm at 12, and so I mispoke. Getting closer, maybe, parity, no. Thanks for the remind. Richard Nichols rnichol1@san.rr.com San Diego, Califo; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00116.html (7,698 bytes)
12. Re: wasting gates (score: 1): Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 17:58:45 -0700; rules it's technically legal. Geez, we've disagreed on a few things in the past, but I see your point on this one. NOT a physics. limited OEM Yes, but. But the flow limits and pressure ratio limits; /html/autox/1999-04/msg01755.html (9,988 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]