Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*weight\s+distribution\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*weight\s+distribution\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. weight distribution (score: 1): Author: Warthodson@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:07:19 EDT; Does anyone know of a source for the front/rear weight distribution for the various big Healeys & Sprites? At the moment, I am particularly interested in the BJ8, but would also like to locate the in; /html/healeys/2006-10/msg00452.html (7,008 bytes)
2. Re: weight distribution (score: 1): Author: "Bluechipracing" <bluechipracing@snet.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:53:09 -0400; My BN1 racer is 52% front, and 48% rear. Thats with no fuel, no driver, no bumpers. roll bar approximately on CG so should have little effect. I can provide corner weights if anyone is interested. Ji; /html/healeys/2006-10/msg00455.html (7,619 bytes)
3. Re: weight distribution (score: 1): Author: "Greg Lemon" <glemon@neb.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:01:38 -0500; This is from Road and Track contemprary road tests: Car F (%) R (%) BJ8* 47 53 Sprite Mk IV 50 50 Sprite MKIII 51 49 BJ7 48 52 Sprite MKII 51 49 3000 MK I 48 52 Bugeye 49 51 100/6 48.5 51.5 100M 48 5; /html/healeys/2006-10/msg00458.html (7,673 bytes)
4. Re: weight distribution (score: 1): Author: "Terry Blubaugh" <tblubaugh@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 07:19:30 -0700; Hi Gary, The original Road & Track test specifications for the Healey 3000 Mk.1, listed the following: Curb weight - 2430 lbs. Test weight - 2760 lbs. weight distribution - 48% / 52% Hope this helps.; /html/healeys/2006-10/msg00459.html (7,684 bytes)
5. Re: weight distribution (score: 1): Author: Randy Hicks <Healey100M@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:49:15 -0400; Fronts lighter than Rears????? Randy Hicks '56 100M '62 BN7 MKII '65 BJ8 '53 MGTD Healey100M@gmail.com; /html/healeys/2006-10/msg00461.html (8,015 bytes)
6. Re: weight distribution (score: 1): Author: "Greg Lemon" <glemon@neb.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:06:30 -0500; I think Road and Track tended to do weight distribution with fluids, if this include a full tank of gas the numbers probably make more sense. Greg Lemon 54 BN1; /html/healeys/2006-10/msg00463.html (6,998 bytes)
7. Re: weight distribution (score: 1): Author: <wilko2@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:52:15 -0700; BJ8 = 52 front 48 rear Mk I = 48.8 front 51.2 rear BN4 = 49 front 51 rear Wilko San Diego; /html/healeys/2006-10/msg00467.html (6,933 bytes)
8. Re: weight distribution (score: 1): Author: N5572B@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:41:53 EDT; Sure, they are front mid engined cars, engine is located behind the front axle line. Rear weight bias makes sense. Dave Duffey 59 BT 7 100-6; /html/healeys/2006-10/msg00474.html (6,992 bytes)
9. Re: weight distribution (score: 1): Author: Warthodson@aol.com; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:15:55 EDT; Hard to believe, isn't it?; /html/healeys/2006-10/msg00482.html (7,111 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]