Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+Connecting\s+Rods\s+with\s+Relief\s+Holes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+Connecting\s+Rods\s+with\s+Relief\s+Holes\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [6pack] Connecting Rods with Relief Holes (score: 1): Author: "Brian J. Alwin" <brian@asmoothmove.biz>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:30:09 -0600; I found a donor engine for my "hot rod" TR-6 engine project. It's a late 72/early 73 that's likely been apart once before. It's in fine condition inside though and even appears to have a forged crank; /html/6pack/2012-12/msg00004.html (9,046 bytes)
2. Re: [6pack] Connecting Rods with Relief Holes (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:20:12 -0500 (EST); Hi, There are two rod styles for TR6, early and late. The late rods appear with the change to CF / CR comm. numbers. The early rods are "better" if you're building a race engine. This is according to; /html/6pack/2012-12/msg00005.html (9,840 bytes)
3. Re: [6pack] Connecting Rods with Relief Holes (score: 1): Author: "Andrew Uprichard" <auprichard@uprichard.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:29:31 -0500; I may be talking out of turn, but my understanding is that factory rods will not withstand significant increases in horse power in these 6-cylinder engines. When I rebuilt my 250, I went for upgraded; /html/6pack/2012-12/msg00006.html (11,251 bytes)
4. Re: [6pack] Connecting Rods with Relief Holes (score: 1): Author: Richard Seaton <rsh17@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:40:46 -0600; I'd suggest,If not going over 150hp, then the stock rods will be fine. I thought I read the late rods were better??? I must be mistaken. ________________________________________ 6pack@autox.team.net; /html/6pack/2012-12/msg00007.html (11,038 bytes)
5. Re: [6pack] Connecting Rods with Relief Holes (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:52:43 -0500 (EST); There's no "out of turn" here. So, no worries. Kastner built his 12.3:1 motors with factory rods. Granted, they were prepped to a high level, but they were factory rods. The prep included lightening; /html/6pack/2012-12/msg00008.html (11,098 bytes)
6. Re: [6pack] Connecting Rods with Relief Holes (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:58:12 -0500 (EST); Don't forget the factory CP cars were 150 HP in stock form. I've had some lengthy discussions with JK Jackson about this and he was, adamant that early rods are the better choice. I believe the reaso; /html/6pack/2012-12/msg00009.html (10,033 bytes)
7. Re: [6pack] Connecting Rods with Relief Holes (score: 1): Author: "Chuck Arnold and/or Kathleen Kelley" <triosan@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:35:34 -0800; Added FOT to this string -- sorry for those it is a duplicate. Wanted to try to equate the hp number I just got of by car from a DynoJet chassis dyno with the numbers from "back in the day". Found a; /html/6pack/2012-12/msg00010.html (13,021 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]