Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+FW\s+$1$\:\s+yc\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+FW\s+$1$\:\s+yc\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [6pack] FW (1): yc (score: 1): Author: Butch Oliver via 6pack <6pack@autox.team.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 08:23:36 -0400; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --==4829151868029840999== boundary="--2DAFBBB7157EF621D50BAE6A" Content-Language: en This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --2DAFBBB7157EF621D50BAE; /html/6pack/2019-04/msg00000.html (10,035 bytes)
2. Re: [6pack] FW (1): yc (score: 1): Author: Mark J Bradakis via 6pack <6pack@autox.team.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 08:56:09 -0600; This is spam!Ā It is a perfect example of why I have set a fairly low limit on number of recipients on the lists.Ā Well, most of them, 6pack was too high, I just fixed it.Ā So evil spam messages l; /html/6pack/2019-04/msg00001.html (8,790 bytes)
3. Re: [6pack] FW (1): yc (score: 1): Author: Bud Rolofson via 6pack <6pack@autox.team.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:43:16 -0600; My BS meter pegged when I saw the ā??VIEW MESSAGEā??. Deleted it then and there. Nice try Butch. I never thought weā??d evolve into having a calibrated sense for spam but thatā??s the world we live i; /html/6pack/2019-04/msg00002.html (10,055 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]