Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Carb\s+spacers\s+\&\s+velocity\s+stack\s+lengths\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] Carb spacers & velocity stack lengths (score: 1)
Author: toodamnfunky@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:42:56 +0000 (UTC)
Greetings Fot I was wondering if anyone has done any experimentation with carb spacers and/or different lengths of velocity stacks. I'm planning some dyno time in the future and want to make the best
/html/fot/2014-08/msg00220.html (9,795 bytes)

2. Re: [Fot] Carb spacers & velocity stack lengths (score: 1)
Author: Joe Alexander <n197tr4@cs.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:34:46 -0500
One of our guys in the NW took the Kastner stacks and cut them. Then he took rubber tube the right size to bring those pieces back together again. It occurs to me that this could be done and move the
/html/fot/2014-08/msg00221.html (10,651 bytes)

3. Re: [Fot] Carb spacers & velocity stack lengths (score: 1)
Author: Duncan Charlton <duncan.charlton54@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:17:58 -0500
Jim, I assume you already looked at Kas' books but didn't find precisely what you needed -- David Vizard's tuning books have a lot of dyno-proven information in them. Duncan Greetings Fot I was wonde
/html/fot/2014-08/msg00232.html (9,746 bytes)

4. Re: [Fot] Carb spacers & velocity stack lengths (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Gray" <toodamnfunky@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:24:49 -0600
I'm trying to get a better understanding of " tuned runner length". Some of the newer cars have variable runner length because as you say Mike conventional wisdom says shorter stacks are better on th
/html/fot/2014-08/msg00240.html (11,677 bytes)

5. Re: [Fot] Carb spacers & velocity stack lengths (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Gray" <toodamnfunky@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:24:55 -0600
I'm trying to get a better understanding of " tuned runner length". Some of the newer cars have variable runner length because as you say Mike conventional wisdom says shorter stacks are better on th
/html/fot/2014-08/msg00241.html (11,669 bytes)

6. Re: [Fot] Carb spacers & velocity stack lengths (score: 1)
Author: malaboge@aol.com
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:11:35 -0400 (EDT)
snip One could say I've done a little work on my manifold. Specifically welded the snott out of it and created the proper taper to the runners. snip I too did a bit of "adding material" to an intake
/html/fot/2014-08/msg00245.html (9,423 bytes)

7. Re: [Fot] Carb spacers & velocity stack lengths (score: 1)
Author: "Barr, Scott" <sbarr@McCarty-Law.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 20:21:36 +0000
Uh-oh. Here comes the "transmissions" discussion again :-) Scott B. snip One could say I've done a little work on my manifold. Specifically welded the snott out of it and created the proper taper to
/html/fot/2014-08/msg00246.html (11,064 bytes)

8. Re: [Fot] Carb spacers & velocity stack lengths (score: 1)
Author: BillDentin@aol.com
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:48:37 -0400 (EDT)
Yeah, sort of. Around here (midwest and points further east) that is sort of the basis. The VSCDA embraces the work of our own Jack Woehrle, who put in a ton of work in and set up some highly respect
/html/fot/2014-08/msg00247.html (10,232 bytes)

9. Re: [Fot] Carb spacers & velocity stack lengths (score: 1)
Author: Vangoughv <vangoughv@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 21:54:35 -0400
Well I'm looking forward to it! I'm learning a lot from you old farts :) LOL Vince trailer I http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/vangoughv@hotmail.com __________________________________________
/html/fot/2014-08/msg00248.html (12,443 bytes)

10. Re: [Fot] Carb spacers & velocity stack lengths (score: 1)
Author: "TeriAnn J. Wakeman" <tjwakeman@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 21:33:45 -0700
If it helps you get started I captured a couple past discussions from this list that you might find useful: http://www.tr3a.info/Net_SUstacks.htm http://www.tr3a.info/Net_intakeAirFlow.htm TeriAnn __
/html/fot/2014-08/msg00251.html (10,068 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu