Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Engine\s+Block\s+numbers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Engine\s+Block\s+numbers\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: steve <colordog.1@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 11:13:35 -0700 (GMT-07:00); Does anyone know of a way to look up TR3-4 engine block commission numbers to find out their date of manufacture and other info? TS67499E TS66557E ~Steve _____________________________________________; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00432.html (10,737 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: John Hasty <jhhasty@gdhs.com>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 14:30:52 -0400; The British Motor Industry Heritage Trust can probably tell you Sent from my iPhone to find out their date of manufacture and other info? _______________________________________________ fot@autox.tea; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00433.html (12,323 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: "Charly Mitchel" <charly@mitchelplumbing.com>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 11:42:31 -0700; We used to see that a lot of engine #'s coincided with the body #, at least we saw this on TR6's and not sure if it holds true on the earlier TR's. It seemed to me that the engine # was about 100 dif; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00434.html (12,598 bytes)
4. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: Kas Kastner <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 22:16:52 +0000; Don't ever be sure that the block even with the same number is the original. I had a set of stamps that were exactly like the factory original stamps. Never be beaten by equipment ___________________; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00435.html (14,269 bytes)
5. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: Mark J Bradakis <mark@bradakis.com>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 19:57:16 -0600; I had a rather early TR6 at one point, CC25064 ( Sorry, AAB guys! ) and the engine number was only off by 8, as I recall, ending in 72. mjb. _______________________________________________ fot@autox.; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00436.html (12,024 bytes)
6. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: "R. John Lye" <rjl@gt-classics.com>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 22:20:36 -0400; Let's see, what color was that TR-6 again, I'm not sure I remember... :-) John -- Thanks, R. John Lye rjl6n@cstone.net _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.net http://www.fo; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00437.html (14,151 bytes)
7. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 19:28:23 -0700; The further along in the production sequence, the further off the numbers got. This is because engines were pulled from the warehouse for warranty replacement and dealer spares stock, while commissio; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00438.html (13,729 bytes)
8. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: "Terry Stetler" <tlizzard@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 23:13:55 -0400 <D7C38EA503104BC9869D292EFEBA312F@Charly><SNT120-W628AE89704860BB0BED67FDF0A0@phx.gbl><4FC6CFFC.20709@bradakis.com> <4175856033D74D40976B2BDF6EB349BF@Vista>; Not to mention the several hundred engines sold to TVR over the course of the years. There were in the neighborhood of 350 Vixen 2500s and who knows how many M Types with the TR6 engine. My Vixen is; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00439.html (13,676 bytes)
9. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: TR4 Tony <tr4.tony@virgin.net>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 13:11:12 +0100; TR4 CT serial led engines are normally within 500 of the comm number. BMIHT have the micro fiche records of all the factory builds only and these are by commission number order. To search for an engi; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00440.html (13,599 bytes)
10. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: Duncan Charlton <duncan.charlton54@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 07:49:59 -0500; I've never figured out whether the numerals would have been sequential if the engines were sent to other car manufacturers, but I suspect they were. Whereas I don't know if TVR engines were marked sp; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00441.html (15,552 bytes)
11. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: fubog1 <fubog1@aol.com>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 09:12:15 -0400 (EDT); What I believe is the original engine from my '72 2500 "hybrid" is CC84762UF. Glen I've never figured out whether the numerals would have been sequential if the engines were sent to other car manufac; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00442.html (16,333 bytes)
12. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: "Bill" <weredinger@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 09:10:40 -0500; Steve; The engines in question were produced around January 1960 and put into cars about that same time frame. The time it took to get from casting to a final vehicle is lost with time, it is anyone'; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00443.html (14,399 bytes)
13. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: Don TR <58tr3a@videotron.ca>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 10:26:09 -0400; According to Bill Piggot's book "Original Triumph TR2, 3, 3A and 3B", on pg 122, TR3A TS 60000 was built in Oct. 1959 and TS 70182 was built in March 1960. Considering that the engine TS numbers were; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00444.html (13,399 bytes)
14. [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: steve <colordog.1@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 11:13:35 -0700 (GMT-07:00); Does anyone know of a way to look up TR3-4 engine block commission numbers to find out their date of manufacture and other info? TS67499E TS66557E ~Steve _____________________________________________; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00884.html (11,254 bytes)
15. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: John Hasty <jhhasty@gdhs.com>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 14:30:52 -0400; The British Motor Industry Heritage Trust can probably tell you Sent from my iPhone to find out their date of manufacture and other info? _______________________________________________ fot@autox.tea; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00885.html (12,481 bytes)
16. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: "Charly Mitchel" <charly@mitchelplumbing.com>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 11:42:31 -0700; We used to see that a lot of engine #'s coincided with the body #, at least we saw this on TR6's and not sure if it holds true on the earlier TR's. It seemed to me that the engine # was about 100 dif; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00886.html (12,881 bytes)
17. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: Kas Kastner <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 22:16:52 +0000; Don't ever be sure that the block even with the same number is the original. I had a set of stamps that were exactly like the factory original stamps. Never be beaten by equipment ___________________; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00887.html (14,609 bytes)
18. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: Mark J Bradakis <mark@bradakis.com>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 19:57:16 -0600; I had a rather early TR6 at one point, CC25064 ( Sorry, AAB guys! ) and the engine number was only off by 8, as I recall, ending in 72. mjb. _______________________________________________ fot@autox.; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00888.html (12,368 bytes)
19. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: "R. John Lye" <rjl@gt-classics.com>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 22:20:36 -0400; Let's see, what color was that TR-6 again, I'm not sure I remember... :-) John mjb. _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.net http://www.fot-racing.com Donate: http://www.tea; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00889.html (14,172 bytes)
20. Re: [Fot] Engine Block numbers (score: 1): Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 19:28:23 -0700; The further along in the production sequence, the further off the numbers got. This is because engines were pulled from the warehouse for warranty replacement and dealer spares stock, while commissio; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00890.html (13,973 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]