Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Engine\s+Vacuum\s+System\s+\-\-SCCA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Engine\s+Vacuum\s+System\s+\-\-SCCA\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] Engine Vacuum System --SCCA (score: 1): Author: Rich Rock <rikrock@live.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:55:55 -0400 FILETIME=[39D82870:01CD06E4]; Finally got an answer from SCCA to the question--why are engine vacuum systems which connect to the exhaust system prohibited by SCCA? I didn't present an argument in favor of the system in my origin; /html/fot/2012-03/msg00172.html (10,638 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] Engine Vacuum System --SCCA (score: 1): Author: "Spitfire Racing" <Spitfire_Racing@twcny.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:25:19 -0400; Have you ever read Don Quixote? This is a big windmill hardly worth the effort. Russ Moore Finally got an answer from SCCA to the question--why are engine vacuum systems which connect to the exhaust; /html/fot/2012-03/msg00173.html (12,179 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] Engine Vacuum System --SCCA (score: 1): Author: "MadMarx" <tr4racing@googlemail.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 23:40:59 +0100; They might suppose the car to be flame thrower with the oil hose connected to the exhaust. I would say that the amount of oil on the road is less with that system and it does indicate very early any; /html/fot/2012-03/msg00174.html (13,022 bytes)
4. Re: [Fot] Engine Vacuum System --SCCA (score: 1): Author: billdentin@aol.com; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:48:50 -0400 (EDT); <<<- Finally got an answer from SCCA to the question--why are engine vacuum ystems which connect to the exhaust system prohibited by SCCA? I didn't resent an argument in favor of the system in my ori; /html/fot/2012-03/msg00175.html (11,603 bytes)
5. Re: [Fot] Engine Vacuum System --SCCA (score: 1): Author: Joe Alexander <n197tr4@cs.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:27:30 -0400 (EDT); Jack Woerhle and I had this discussion a very long time ago. His response, in writing, was that anything that kept oil off the track was OK with him at tech. I am still in contact with him from time; /html/fot/2012-03/msg00176.html (13,038 bytes)
6. Re: [Fot] Engine Vacuum System --SCCA (score: 1): Author: Joe Alexander <n197tr4@cs.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:41:56 -0400 (EDT); unlikely any real research was done. but asking about it seems worthwhile. thanks Rich Joe Alexander A. R. E. 645 1st Street Jesup, Iowa 50648 319.464.4711 (cell) n197tr4@cs.com Finally got an answer; /html/fot/2012-03/msg00178.html (12,380 bytes)
7. Re: [Fot] Engine Vacuum System --SCCA (score: 1): Author: Aaron Johnson <fpspitfire@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:42:57 -0500; This is probably about as good of a battle to pick as asking for slicks and fender flares in a vintage series. None of us run an exhaust vacuum system, none of us need to run them and none of the peo; /html/fot/2012-03/msg00179.html (12,444 bytes)
8. Re: [Fot] Engine Vacuum System --SCCA (score: 1): Author: Robert Deanes <rfdeanes@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:21:24 -0400; I did win a tire selection with Jack recently and it is now in writing of a brouder selection of tires that we may run. It still doesn't accomadate slicks but that wasn't what I was after.I will post; /html/fot/2012-03/msg00180.html (15,171 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]