Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+FW\:\s+Racing\s+rod\s+design\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] FW: Racing rod design (score: 1)
Author: "Marcel Van Mulders" <van.mulders.marcel@telenet.be>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:31:40 +0200
--Oorspronkelijk bericht-- Van: Marcel Van Mulders [mailto:van.mulders.marcel@telenet.be] Verzonden: woensdag 22 juli 2015 19:29 Aan: 'MadMarx' Onderwerp: RE: [Fot] Racing rod design Hi Chris and Bob
/html/fot/2015-07/msg00169.html (12,596 bytes)

2. Re: [Fot] FW: Racing rod design (score: 1)
Author: <rkramer3@austin.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 20:32:04 +0000
Marcel, Those are Carillo's on a TR spec Moldex crank spinning Wieseco pistons. I did buy some Pauters but they are in another engine and haven't been tested as hard as the Carillos. I still have a T
/html/fot/2015-07/msg00174.html (14,913 bytes)

3. Re: [Fot] FW: Racing rod design (score: 1)
Author: "Marcel Van Mulders" <van.mulders.marcel@telenet.be>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 23:24:47 +0200
Bob, That makes things clear. I still use the Carrillo's that I bought when I startet racing my TR3A in 2002. About everything broke once or more, except those Carrillo's. The original Triumph conrod
/html/fot/2015-07/msg00175.html (15,281 bytes)

4. Re: [Fot] FW: Racing rod design (score: 1)
Author: <rkramer3@austin.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 22:32:00 +0000
Marcel. I had a spectacular blow up at Mosport one year, in front of Kas and the whole FOT gang. Those were the last stock rods I ever used. LAter I went to the Moldex and other than a crack in a jou
/html/fot/2015-07/msg00177.html (16,991 bytes)

5. Re: [Fot] FW: Racing rod design (score: 1)
Author: chasgee22@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:38:41 -0700
You shouldn't be concerned with the Pauter rods. I've used them for years and rev them to 8k regularly. They use them in some very high output VW and Porsche engines with no problems. Chuck _________
/html/fot/2015-07/msg00178.html (18,482 bytes)

6. Re: [Fot] FW: Racing rod design (score: 1)
Author: "MadMarx" <tr4racing@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:15:19 +0200
Hi Bob, I'm sorry to worry you, that wasn't my intention. But maths doesn't lie. Must be a reason why high volume car producer make all rods of the same pattern. It would be a lot cheaper to make the
/html/fot/2015-07/msg00183.html (18,616 bytes)

7. Re: [Fot] FW: Racing rod design (score: 1)
Author: <rkramer3@austin.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:15:54 +0000
Chris, No worries. Others have been running the Pauters very hard with good results. I suspect that both the H-Beam and I-Beam designs, as well as the Pauter "cross-beam (an inside-out H beam)" are b
/html/fot/2015-07/msg00189.html (20,688 bytes)

8. Re: [Fot] FW: Racing rod design (score: 1)
Author: "MadMarx" <tr4racing@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:22:04 +0200
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --==4486380386478549421== boundary="--=_NextPart_000_005E_01D0C585.3E0B13E0" Content-Language: de This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPar
/html/fot/2015-07/msg00202.html (42,709 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu