- 1. Re: [Fot] Fot Digest, Vol 98, Issue 333 (score: 1)
- Author: Don Couch <don@dcphotos.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 14:28:08 -0600
- Might be wrong here, but isn't the GT6 input shaft too long for the Spitfire's bell housing? Don Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.net http://www.fot-
- /html/fot/2015-12/msg00180.html (11,244 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Fot] Fot Digest, Vol 98, Issue 333 (score: 1)
- Author: REK46@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 15:57:52 -0500
- --==6077256991022695971== --part1_7ccd21.a1cb328.43a5cd50_boundary Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Might be wrong here, but isn't the GT6 input shaft too long for the Spitfire's bell housing? Don Sen
- /html/fot/2015-12/msg00181.html (18,040 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Fot] Fot Digest, Vol 98, Issue 333 (score: 1)
- Author: "Spitfire Racing" <Spitfire_Racing@twcny.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:18:05 -0500
- Yes, that's why it gets machined down to the identical length of a Spitfire's input shaft. In addition to that there's a little machine work to fit a front seal. With this done you use a standard Spi
- /html/fot/2015-12/msg00182.html (12,726 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu