Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Intake\s+\/\s+Exhaust\s+manifold\s+mating\s+surfaces\s+to\s+head\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Intake\s+\/\s+Exhaust\s+manifold\s+mating\s+surfaces\s+to\s+head\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] Intake / Exhaust manifold mating surfaces to head (score: 1): Author: Dan <adcronin@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:46:03 -0400; I am preparing my TR4a head to accept the intake and exhaust manifolds and there seems to be a rather significant difference in the diameters between the intake ports of the head (1-1/2" dia.) and th; /html/fot/2014-10/msg00058.html (8,733 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] Intake / Exhaust manifold mating surfaces to head (score: 1): Author: Tony Drews <tony@tonydrews.com>; Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 21:49:06 -0500; You're very liable to make things worse by opening up the manifold. Having the manifold port somewhat smaller than the head port isn't a big problem. Tony Drews ______________________________________; /html/fot/2014-10/msg00061.html (10,267 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] Intake / Exhaust manifold mating surfaces to head (score: 1): Author: Duncan Charlton <duncan.charlton54@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 08:10:23 -0500; My book sources indicate that it's fine for the intake manifold runner to be slightly smaller than the port entrance on the head, and the opposite goes for the exhaust port/manifold junction. Pulsing; /html/fot/2014-10/msg00062.html (12,072 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]