- 1. [Fot] Rover V8s (score: 1)
- Author: Joe Alexander <joealexandervintage@gmail.com> boundary=Apple-Mail-F31ACBA6-8771-4CD6-95B9-59E4668AE7C3
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:40:24 -0500
- --Apple-Mail-F31ACBA6-8771-4CD6-95B9-59E4668AE7C3 charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris, Paul, Ted, Jack, Starting with the 3.5 liter engine, do the larger disp. Rover En
- /html/fot/2016-10/msg00125.html (697,657 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Fot] Rover V8s (score: 1)
- Author: Duncan Charlton <duncan.charlton54@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:16:20 -0500
- Joe, I suspect so. Sources Iā??ve looked at for Morgan spare parts only list one part number even though the Plus 8 was sold for 35 years with 3.5, 3.9, 4.0 and 4.6 liter engines. Rimmer Bros. in the
- /html/fot/2016-10/msg00129.html (10,327 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Fot] Rover V8s (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Deanes <rfdeanes@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:24:04 -0400
- --==1599826622363972745== --001a1145c83ad05567053f50079a Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I believe that the sanctioning bodys (SCCA,etc.) limit the engine to the 3.9 in the rule book.Othe
- /html/fot/2016-10/msg00130.html (18,050 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Fot] Rover V8s (score: 1)
- Author: Duncan Charlton <duncan.charlton54@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 19:57:00 -0500
- --==7197386793422700928== --Apple-Mail=_0BD23FBD-FBF9-44FB-8836-7689C01F6C5A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable charset=utf-8 The 3.9 vs 4.0 is a head-fake on Rover=E2=80=99s part. Bore and
- /html/fot/2016-10/msg00132.html (24,619 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu