Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Spitfire\s+Synchros\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Spitfire\s+Synchros\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] Spitfire Synchros (score: 1): Author: "Joe Guinan" <joeg@neb.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 14:02:07 -0500; Is the "Common Knowledge" that repro synchronizer rings are junk still current, or has anyone had success with new batches of these buggers? A friend is having to rebuild a late single rail box becau; /html/fot/2014-08/msg00035.html (8,649 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] Spitfire Synchros (score: 1): Author: "Spitfire Racing" <Spitfire_Racing@twcny.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 15:47:30 -0400; I have been using the synchros from Spitbits and never had a problem on Spitfires and GT-6s. I think you may be confusing these with the synchros for the big TR's, most of which are junk made by the; /html/fot/2014-08/msg00036.html (10,147 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] Spitfire Synchros (score: 1): Author: John Hasty <jhasty@mhc-law.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 20:40:56 +0000; My experience is that the German ones are little better.... My close ratio Tr box still scrapes if you try and shift with the speed that racing requires going up in the box. Not as bad going down. Se; /html/fot/2014-08/msg00037.html (12,356 bytes)
4. Re: [Fot] Spitfire Synchros (score: 1): Author: "Steve Yott" <tr4@wi.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 16:08:19 -0500; The late Spitfire (large) synchros offered by the big suppliers are all "County" brand and they are a problem. I have run through many and all of them are of poor quality. The issue is that they are; /html/fot/2014-08/msg00039.html (12,154 bytes)
5. Re: [Fot] Spitfire Synchros (score: 1): Author: John Styduhar <johnstydo@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 19:13:42 -0400; Steve, is there any stamping or other identification marking on the better synchros for the TR3-4 box, or do they look the same as the other brand? _______________________________________________ fot; /html/fot/2014-08/msg00042.html (14,452 bytes)
6. Re: [Fot] Spitfire Synchros (score: 1): Author: "Steve Yott" <tr4@wi.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 18:19:06 -0500; Great questionb&. There is no other identification!!! Kind of scaryb&b&. The difference that I see is that the County versions are packed in County labeled cardboardb& the b betterb version is packed; /html/fot/2014-08/msg00043.html (13,245 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]