Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Spitfire\s+timing\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] Spitfire timing? (score: 1)
Author: Bud Rolofson <levilevi@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:57:38 -0600
Amici, What timing setting are you Spitfire racers using? I've seen suggestions from 32 degrees total advance to 48. Thanks Bud Sent from Vail pass 10881 ft elevation. Will be back home in a couple h
/html/fot/2015-06/msg00018.html (8,479 bytes)

2. Re: [Fot] Spitfire timing? (score: 1)
Author: toodamnfunky@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 18:29:26 +0000 (UTC)
--==6444053493524908385== boundary="--=_Part_21072258_662714414.1433269766165" --=_Part_21072258_662714414.1433269766165 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bud, Correct me if I'm wrong but you are talki
/html/fot/2015-06/msg00019.html (13,263 bytes)

3. Re: [Fot] Spitfire timing? (score: 1)
Author: "Spitfire Racing" <Spitfire_Racing@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:34:58 -0400
Bud, it depends on the cam you're using. Typically it is safe to set for a total of 32 degrees at 3000 rpm on most comp cams. Set it according to the cam data sheet though to be safe. Russ Moore Spit
/html/fot/2015-06/msg00025.html (9,927 bytes)

4. Re: [Fot] Spitfire timing? (score: 1)
Author: Greg And Alison Blake <ablake2@austin.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 17:01:40 -0500
Not a spitfire guy but 48???? WOW that seems really high. My TR3 race motor likes 30. It's never been on a Dyno so I am sure I am leaving some power unused, but I don't melt Pistons or hammer bearing
/html/fot/2015-06/msg00032.html (10,433 bytes)

5. Re: [Fot] Spitfire timing? (score: 1)
Author: Duncan Charlton <duncan.charlton54@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 17:53:58 -0500
I assume that includes vacuum advance, which many racers would not use. I have always assumed that the vacuum advance is really a fuel economy improvement device and that it would not ever come into
/html/fot/2015-06/msg00034.html (11,699 bytes)

6. Re: [Fot] Spitfire timing? (score: 1)
Author: Edward Dunn <edunn@transfueler.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:56:23 -0700
--==0581996810948083127== Content-Language: en-US boundary="_004_36946218D9EC344498D59FD515FE20FB04E8CB462F0CTITANdwhold_"; type="multipart/alternative" --_004_36946218D9EC344498D59FD515FE20FB04E8CB4
/html/fot/2015-06/msg00035.html (37,551 bytes)

7. Re: [Fot] Spitfire timing? (score: 1)
Author: Kas Kastner <kaskastner@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 16:13:38 -0700
--==2139268231357651132== --001a11c36c96112bfb0517911a6d Ignition timing is decided by the quality of the gasoline provided to the engine and the elimination of detonation. With 100 octane you would
/html/fot/2015-06/msg00036.html (22,350 bytes)

8. Re: [Fot] Spitfire timing? (score: 1)
Author: Bud R <levilevi@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:05:52 -0600
--==2361524621839513257== --Apple-Mail=_2982D6B4-9DD4-46BB-96B7-B8E917E75213 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable charset=windows-1252 Thanks for all the comments on timing. The source of the
/html/fot/2015-06/msg00037.html (20,234 bytes)

9. Re: [Fot] Spitfire timing? (score: 1)
Author: Bud R <levilevi@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:20:09 -0600
--==8110779567980212526== --Apple-Mail=_6F9ED575-BFD6-4C92-ACE1-841D27FE1F7D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable charset=windows-1252 Thanks Kas, The idea of starting high and backing off the
/html/fot/2015-06/msg00038.html (33,705 bytes)

10. Re: [Fot] Spitfire timing? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Norlin <norlinengineering@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 19:07:13 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --==1096427882396640526== boundary="--010107070607060602030601" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --010107070607060602030601 Content-Transfer-E
/html/fot/2015-06/msg00039.html (34,372 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu