Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+TR2\s+Cylinder\s+Head\s+Studs\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] TR2 Cylinder Head Studs (score: 1)
Author: "M&M Hado" <mhado@att.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:48:25 -0600
I was just finishing up a TR2 engine rebuild and one of the 9.5" studs stripped the threads in the block at the bottom of the 4" hole when I got to about 70 ft-lb. Has anyone successfully put a HeliC
/html/fot/2012-12/msg00237.html (9,507 bytes)

2. Re: [Fot] TR2 Cylinder Head Studs (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kramer <rkramer3@austin.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:21:07 -0600
I don't know about the Helicoil option. You might be able to convert the "hole" to a short stud with a Helicoil but it may stress the block improperly. FWIW I took apart one block that had a long stu
/html/fot/2012-12/msg00269.html (11,825 bytes)

3. Re: [Fot] TR2 Cylinder Head Studs (score: 1)
Author: "M&M Hado" <mhado@att.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:34:50 -0600
Thanks, Bob. I have decided to put the HeliCoil at the top of the hole and use a short stud. The existing hole is already the exact size for the HeliCoil tap so the installation was easy. I torqued i
/html/fot/2012-12/msg00270.html (12,208 bytes)

4. Re: [Fot] TR2 Cylinder Head Studs (score: 1)
Author: "MadMarx" <tr4racing@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:36:41 +0100
If that would be good to set the bolt upstairs to the block to the factory would have done it back in the days - shorter bolts are cheaper ;-) I once did cure the problem this way. I drilled out the
/html/fot/2012-12/msg00272.html (13,507 bytes)

5. Re: [Fot] TR2 Cylinder Head Studs (score: 1)
Author: Duncan Charlton <duncan.charlton54@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:06:35 -0600
The factory did make them short -- on the Standard Vanguard engine that preceded the TR engine. Duncan (Texas) 1952 Morgan Plus 4 (had the Vanguard engine when new) __________________________________
/html/fot/2012-12/msg00276.html (9,517 bytes)

6. Re: [Fot] TR2 Cylinder Head Studs (score: 1)
Author: Duncan Charlton <duncan.charlton54@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:45:08 -0600
The Standard Vanguard was 2088 cc's and power rating was 68 hp at 4300 rpm, whereas the 1990 cc TR2 engine (same stroke, 1mm smaller bore) produced 90 hp at 4800 rpm. I have read a story about Standa
/html/fot/2012-12/msg00277.html (9,782 bytes)

7. Re: [Fot] TR2 Cylinder Head Studs (score: 1)
Author: "Stutzmans" <stutzmans@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 21:18:55 -0500 s=q20121106; t=1356142735; bh=myEa8aYst6j77i1J6yblw2cPGqUjcPWgQNzHDLs5PeM=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=QxLACGO8P
One of the many modifications made when the 68 hp. Vangard engine was being modified for the 90 hp. TR2, was changing the block casting so longer studs could be screwed deeper into the block. The blo
/html/fot/2012-12/msg00283.html (11,573 bytes)

8. Re: [Fot] TR2 Cylinder Head Studs (score: 1)
Author: "M&M Hado" <mhado@att.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 21:26:16 -0600
I'm crossing my fingers, but I think it will be fine. Thanks for all the input from everyone. Mike One of the many modifications made when the 68 hp. Vangard engine was being modified for the 90 hp.
/html/fot/2012-12/msg00287.html (12,387 bytes)

9. Re: [Fot] TR2 Cylinder Head Studs (score: 1)
Author: "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:47:46 -0800
Didn't it also use smaller studs, and make about half as much power? -- Randall _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.net http://www.fot-racing.com Archive: http://www.team.
/html/fot/2012-12/msg00288.html (8,916 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu