Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+TR4\s+crank\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+TR4\s+crank\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: westerneagleracing@att.net; Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 16:23:03 -0700 (PDT); FOT, I am having the engine in my TR4A race car rebuilt. Are there any alternatives to a billet crank? We are looking for about 150hp (not a super powerful 170-190). Thanks. Western Eagle Racing/Ron; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00032.html (11,530 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: Joe Alexander <n197tr4@cs.com>; Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 20:20:41 -0400 (EDT); We ran 19 years without having a broken crank. Without any special preparation. Now we have a billet crank, but only because we came into a 'cracked' billet crank. I was going to make another end tab; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00034.html (12,659 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: Tony Drews <tony@tonydrews.com>; Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 21:42:19 -0500; As I understand it, the stock crank will live pretty much forever if you shift at 5,000 RPM. If well prepared (good radius between bearing surfaces and the rest of the crank, possibly nitrided as wel; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00042.html (12,511 bytes)
4. Re: [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: "TeriAnn J. Wakeman" <tjwakeman@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 21:29:17 -0700; I don't remember the RPMs and I can't find them in my notes so my numbers will be a little iffy. The way I heard it is that stock granks hold up well below the 5000 RPM red line. A little above 5000; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00044.html (13,611 bytes)
5. Re: [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 22:22:41 -0700; Yes, a properly prepared, nitrided, stock crank is good for 6800 rpm and 160 hp for a long time with light rods, pistons, and an aluminum flywheel with a diaphragm clutch. It does not need a damper o; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00045.html (11,768 bytes)
6. Re: [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: "Peter Vucinic" <pvucinic@netspace.net.au>; Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 16:00:52 +1000; TeriAnn, You are absolutely correct about wanting to stay away from any crankshafts natural frequency. Operating in this range will induce crankshaft 'whip' and severe bending moments into the cranks; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00047.html (15,437 bytes)
7. Re: [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: tr4racing@googlemail.com; Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 07:05:56 +0000; Hi, I run a stock crank too. I use revs up to 6400 (rev limiter) but in most cases I shift around 6200. I got benefit of a light aluminium pulley on front and a 6 kg light flywheel / clutch unit. I f; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00049.html (11,923 bytes)
8. Re: [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: "john hasty" <jhhasty@gdhs.com>; Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 12:35:53 -0400; Me too.....6000rpm John H. Hasty Attorney At Law Guthrie, Davis, Henderson & Staton, P.L.L.C. 719 East Boulevard Charlotte, North Carolina 28203-5113 Tele: (704) 372-5600 Fax: (704) 372-4601 E-mail:; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00057.html (13,962 bytes)
9. Re: [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: Joe Alexander <n197tr4@cs.com>; Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 15:48:06 -0400 (EDT); With the Larry Young designed cam, power comes on much earlier, and shift points much lower. A well done crank as Greg and others describe improves the probability of sustained life. But something te; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00063.html (15,033 bytes)
10. [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: westerneagleracing@att.net; Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 16:23:03 -0700 (PDT); FOT, I am having the engine in my TR4A race car rebuilt. Are there any alternatives to a billet crank? We are looking for about 150hp (not a super powerful 170-190). Thanks. Western Eagle Racing/Ron; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00489.html (11,369 bytes)
11. Re: [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: Joe Alexander <n197tr4@cs.com>; Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 20:20:41 -0400 (EDT); We ran 19 years without having a broken crank. Without any special preparation. Now we have a billet crank, but only because we came into a 'cracked' billet crank. I was going to make another end tab; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00491.html (13,121 bytes)
12. Re: [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: Tony Drews <tony@tonydrews.com>; Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 21:42:19 -0500; As I understand it, the stock crank will live pretty much forever if you shift at 5,000 RPM. If well prepared (good radius between bearing surfaces and the rest of the crank, possibly nitrided as wel; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00499.html (12,931 bytes)
13. Re: [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: "TeriAnn J. Wakeman" <tjwakeman@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 21:29:17 -0700; On 5/2/12 7:42 PM, Tony Drews wrote: As I understand it, the stock crank will live pretty much forever if you shift at 5,000 RPM. If well prepared (good radius between bearing surfaces and the rest o; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00501.html (14,209 bytes)
14. Re: [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 22:22:41 -0700; Yes, a properly prepared, nitrided, stock crank is good for 6800 rpm and 160 hp for a long time with light rods, pistons, and an aluminum flywheel with a diaphragm clutch. It does not need a damper o; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00502.html (12,138 bytes)
15. Re: [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: "Peter Vucinic" <pvucinic@netspace.net.au>; Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 16:00:52 +1000; TeriAnn, You are absolutely correct about wanting to stay away from any crankshafts natural frequency. Operating in this range will induce crankshaft 'whip' and severe bending moments into the cranks; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00504.html (15,934 bytes)
16. Re: [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: tr4racing@googlemail.com; Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 07:05:56 +0000; Hi, I run a stock crank too. I use revs up to 6400 (rev limiter) but in most cases I shift around 6200. I got benefit of a light aluminium pulley on front and a 6 kg light flywheel / clutch unit. I f; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00506.html (12,098 bytes)
17. Re: [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: "john hasty" <jhhasty@gdhs.com>; Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 12:35:53 -0400; Me too.....6000rpm John H. Hasty Attorney At Law Guthrie, Davis, Henderson & Staton, P.L.L.C. 719 East Boulevard Charlotte, North Carolina 28203-5113 Tele: (704) 372-5600 Fax: (704) 372-4601 E-mail:; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00514.html (13,648 bytes)
18. Re: [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: Joe Alexander <n197tr4@cs.com>; Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 15:48:06 -0400 (EDT); With the Larry Young designed cam, power comes on much earlier, and shift points much lower. A well done crank as Greg and others describe improves the probability of sustained life. But something te; /html/fot/2012-05/msg00520.html (15,204 bytes)
19. [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: "trmarty@hotmail.com" <trmarty@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 07:26:58 -0400 FILETIME=[D7B42250:01CD7F8F]; Anybody know off the top of your head what the thread size is in the front of a, TR4 crank? Marty Sent via DroidX2 on Verizon Wirelessb " _______________________________________________ fot@autox.tea; /html/fot/2012-08/msg00104.html (7,702 bytes)
20. Re: [Fot] TR4 crank (score: 1): Author: Tony Drews <tony@tonydrews.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:26:51 -0500; I measure 0.630", fine thread. Must be 5/8". Tony _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.net http://www.fot-racing.com Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http:/; /html/fot/2012-08/msg00115.html (8,984 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]