Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+TR4\s+deck\s+height\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+TR4\s+deck\s+height\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] TR4 deck height (score: 1): Author: "Jim Gray" <toodamnfunky@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:27:14 -0700; Greetings FoT, I was curious as to what the group likes to run for deck height or piston to head clearance assuming forged rods and stock crank are used. I have heard everywhere from zero to .040 Tha; /html/fot/2013-01/msg00193.html (9,205 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] TR4 deck height (score: 1): Author: Christian Marx <tr4racing@googlemail.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 22:59:34 -0800; _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.net http://www.fot-racing.com Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/mharc@autox.te; /html/fot/2013-01/msg00194.html (9,937 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] TR4 deck height (score: 1): Author: "Joe Boruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:38:35 GMT; With a billet crank and Pauter rods I use a 0.010 inch deck height, plus allow 0.022 for the head gasket. I have run as little as 0.007 deck, but had impressions of the head on top of the pistons. Jo; /html/fot/2013-01/msg00316.html (9,784 bytes)
4. Re: [Fot] TR4 deck height (score: 1): Author: Kas Kastner <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 02:32:53 +0000; Impression in the carbon is just right. Never be beaten by equipment allow to http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/kaskas@cox.net _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.n; /html/fot/2013-01/msg00318.html (11,622 bytes)
5. Re: [Fot] TR4 deck height (score: 1): Author: TR4 Tony <tr4.tony@virgin.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:52:07 +0000; Hi all We run 8 thou with a steel crank , carillo rods. Flat top Venoila pistons and a very modified head on my TR4. As a consequence the engine 'drinks' a little and now and again when fresh and a t; /html/fot/2013-01/msg00324.html (13,017 bytes)
6. Re: [Fot] TR4 deck height (score: 1): Author: steve <colordog.1@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 06:58:24 -0800 (GMT-08:00); If any of you are fairly new at this, be warned... With my modified stock crank, Carillo rods, forged Wiseco pistons, and steel-shim head gasket, my piston "kissed" the head at high RPM and I spun a; /html/fot/2013-01/msg00326.html (15,259 bytes)
7. Re: [Fot] TR4 deck height (score: 1): Author: "MadMarx" <tr4racing@googlemail.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:38:01 +0100; Man, you are very brave people in USA. I run a total of 0.0511" just in case of a bearing problem. Surviving of the engine in case of something bad is more important to me than 2 HP more caused by mo; /html/fot/2013-01/msg00328.html (16,291 bytes)
8. Re: [Fot] TR4 deck height (score: 1): Author: John Wagner <j.wags63@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:55:51 -0800 (PST); A good rule of thumb is .005 for every 1000 rpm. ________________________________ From: Joe Boruch <jaboruch@netzero.net> To: toodamnfunky@comcast.net Cc: fot@autox.team.net Sent: Tuesday, January 22; /html/fot/2013-01/msg00330.html (10,503 bytes)
9. Re: [Fot] TR4 deck height (score: 1): Author: John Hasty <jhhasty@gdhs.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:37:51 -0500; Not that it is on subject; but we ran 1mm in my 250cc two stroke GP Yamaha motors. Sent from my iPhone sender to send it again using a different format or email program. text/plain __________________; /html/fot/2013-01/msg00332.html (9,337 bytes)
10. Re: [Fot] TR4 deck height (score: 1): Author: "Joe Boruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 01:47:47 GMT; It was more than just an impression in the carbon. It was an impression in the aluminum. Joe(B) Impression in the carbon is just right. Never be beaten by equipment allow ____________________________; /html/fot/2013-01/msg00420.html (9,576 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]