Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Team\.Net\s+progress\,\s+I\s+hope\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Team\.Net\s+progress\,\s+I\s+hope\!\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] Team.Net progress, I hope! (score: 1): Author: Mark J Bradakis <mark@bradakis.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 19:58:57 -0600; The last few days you may have noticed that it might take 2, 3, 4 or more hours for a simple message to one of the Team.Net lists to get posted. There have been some serious network problems happenin; /html/fot/2013-09/msg00431.html (8,729 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] Team.Net progress, I hope! (score: 1): Author: "TeriAnn J. Wakeman" <tjwakeman@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 21:20:06 -0700; Mark it would be nice if you would continue allowing attachments on the FOT list. TeriAnn _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.net http://www.fot-racing.com Archive: http://; /html/fot/2013-09/msg00433.html (10,258 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] Team.Net progress, I hope! (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@spitfire4.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 00:33:31 -0500; That, and set it up so it doesn't care whether or not we wipe the earlier messages off the bottom of the post. Bandwidth issues generally aren't what they were 10 years ago. And I like being able to; /html/fot/2013-09/msg00434.html (10,134 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]