Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+difference\s+early\s+and\s+late\s+TR6\s+Cylinder\s+head\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] difference early and late TR6 Cylinder head (score: 1)
Author: Henry Morrison <dos_gusanos@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 13:41:34 -0600 FILETIME=[89DC3960:01CFE19D]
Good Day, Could someone refresh me on the centers of the ports on the early style cylinder head? Thanks in advance, Henry Morrison Albuquerque, NM _______________________________________________ fot@
/html/fot/2014-10/msg00020.html (9,087 bytes)

2. Re: [Fot] difference early and late TR6 Cylinder head (score: 1)
Author: "Charly Mitchel" <charly@mitchelplumbing.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 12:43:47 -0700 reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0
The earlier heads are closer together, I believe the same as GT6 Heads. Charly Mitchel -- Original Message -- From: "Henry Morrison" <dos_gusanos@msn.com> To: "fot" <fot@autox.team.net> Sent: Monday,
/html/fot/2014-10/msg00021.html (10,788 bytes)

3. Re: [Fot] difference early and late TR6 Cylinder head (score: 1)
Author: Brian Dennis <britracer89@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 12:55:40 -0700
The GT6 MK 2 and 3 have the wider ports as does the later TR6 heads. The TR250 (and I think the very early TR6) has the narrow port head (intake ports closer together). Brian Foster, RI _____________
/html/fot/2014-10/msg00022.html (12,480 bytes)

4. Re: [Fot] difference early and late TR6 Cylinder head (score: 1)
Author: "Charly Mitchel" <charly@mitchelplumbing.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 12:58:36 -0700 reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0
TR6 changed about 1972, I believe. Charly Mitchel -- Original Message -- From: Brian Dennis To: Charly Mitchel ; Henry Morrison ; fot Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 12:55 PM Subject: Re: [Fot] differ
/html/fot/2014-10/msg00023.html (12,819 bytes)

5. Re: [Fot] difference early and late TR6 Cylinder head (score: 1)
Author: Henry Morrison <dos_gusanos@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 14:22:05 -0600
Right, the movement was in the vertical plane, the head I have is about 1" center of intake to center of exhaust, both manifolds will bolt up but the ports are off a little bit. Any body know what th
/html/fot/2014-10/msg00024.html (13,132 bytes)

6. Re: [Fot] difference early and late TR6 Cylinder head (score: 1)
Author: Ted Schumacher <tedtsimx@bright.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:25:46 -0400
Early - 5/8"; later - 7/8". Ted -- Ted Schumacher tedtsimx@bright.net http://www.tsimportedautomotive.com 108 S. Jefferson St. Pandora, Ohio, USA 45877 Fax: 419.384.3272 (24 Hrs.) Phone: 800.543.6648
/html/fot/2014-10/msg00025.html (11,992 bytes)

7. Re: [Fot] difference early and late TR6 Cylinder head (score: 1)
Author: Mark J Bradakis <mark@bradakis.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 14:46:50 -0600
Drat. I used to have the numbers in my head. Oh well, the onset of CRS. The close port heads are 1.91 center to center, the later 2.21 inches. mjb. _______________________________________________ fot
/html/fot/2014-10/msg00026.html (10,051 bytes)

8. Re: [Fot] difference early and late TR6 Cylinder head (score: 1)
Author: "Enquiries Road & Track" <enquiries@roadandtrack.net.au>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 16:44:24 +1000
i know 100% all the TR6 PI/2500TC heads used the same inlet manifold layout/gasket, which is totally different spacing to the TR250 heads. As i'm not USA based, i have no confidence in any claims abo
/html/fot/2014-10/msg00045.html (10,134 bytes)

9. Re: [Fot] difference early and late TR6 Cylinder head (score: 1)
Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 07:25:55 -0400 (EDT)
Correct. The "Federal Spec" TR6 got the narrow port head from CC25000 up to CC75000. After that, "Federal Spec" TR6's got the (better) "wide port" PI head. TR6's comm. numbers for the 72 model year s
/html/fot/2014-10/msg00046.html (10,817 bytes)

10. Re: [Fot] difference early and late TR6 Cylinder head (score: 1)
Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 07:32:51 -0400 (EDT)
http://goodparts.com/shop/index.php?categoryID=36 scan down to the manifold gasket section. Early has 1.875 spacing (center to center) Late has 2.187 spacing (c to c) c ya, rml -- Bob Lang Triumph T
/html/fot/2014-10/msg00047.html (10,879 bytes)

11. Re: [Fot] difference early and late TR6 Cylinder head (score: 1)
Author: <rkramer3@austin.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 11:39:17 +0000
I have a 1972 TR6 CC75059LO, the 59th (or is that 60th) car after the switch to the dual exhaust and long branch intake manifold. I always that the 1972 model (built in 1971 in this case) was the poi
/html/fot/2014-10/msg00048.html (12,243 bytes)

12. Re: [Fot] difference early and late TR6 Cylinder head (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Tobin" <william.tobin31@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 07:53:15 -0400
This brings up another qustion: what's the difference between a long branch intake as opposed to a not-long branch (short branch?)? Part numbers? Usage? This bunch is a treasure of information! Thank
/html/fot/2014-10/msg00049.html (13,391 bytes)

13. Re: [Fot] difference early and late TR6 Cylinder head (score: 1)
Author: Ted Schumacher <tedtsimx@bright.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 12:18:14 -0400
Bill, short answer - the longer the run, the lower the power band. Shorter the run, higher the power band. With the engines being "choked" by US emission requirements, going to long runner manifold,
/html/fot/2014-10/msg00051.html (15,942 bytes)

14. Re: [Fot] difference early and late TR6 Cylinder head (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Durant <jeff_durant@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 06:38:19 -0700
Bill, The "short" branch intake manifold came with 2 p/n's, 308088 (TR250 and TR6 (up to engine CC50000) and 311378 (TR6 CC50000 up to CC75000). Both have the narrow intake spacing. The "long" branch
/html/fot/2014-10/msg00055.html (15,087 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu