- 1. [Fot] quench clearance (score: 1)
- Author: don at dcphotos.com (don at dcphotos.com)
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 15:55:56 -0500
- Amici, Building a small journal 1296cc Spitfire. Running Venolia?s over Carrillos been know to go to 8500K rpm (occasionally). Going to have the block/pistons decked to zero. (can someone tell me a b
- /html/fot/2018-07/msg00177.html (7,646 bytes)
- 2. [Fot] quench clearance (score: 1)
- Author: duncan.charlton54 at gmail.com (Duncan Charlton)
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 21:34:22 -0400
- Don, One engine builder insisted that 0.040? was ideal for good combustion while avoiding detonation, so that?s what I have attempted to achieve. Duncan -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbe
- /html/fot/2018-07/msg00178.html (9,204 bytes)
- 3. [Fot] quench clearance (score: 1)
- Author: fubog1 at aol.com (fubog1)
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 14:46:52 -0400
- If you have good race rods and all of the clearances are to spec, you could pop it up a few thou but I wouldn't go any less than .030. Yes you can run it a little tighter but that's the point where t
- /html/fot/2018-07/msg00181.html (8,739 bytes)
- 4. [Fot] quench clearance (score: 1)
- Author: jhasty at mhc-law.com (John H. Hasty)
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 21:06:10 +0000
- Not apples to apples, but just for info. We used a squash of .020, no gasket, O ring, & turned 13 to 14 rpm with our 2 stroke 250cc motors. Cannot remember the cc?s for the heads. But it took many, m
- /html/fot/2018-07/msg00182.html (9,418 bytes)
- 5. [Fot] quench clearance (score: 1)
- Author: rick.parent at att.net (Rick Parent)
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 22:42:32 +0000 (UTC)
- .035 is fine with the stock gasket. Not apples to apples, but just for info. We used a squash of .020, no gasket, O ring, & turned 13 to 14 rpm with our 2 stroke 250cc motors. Cannot remember the cc?
- /html/fot/2018-07/msg00187.html (9,949 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu