Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+variation\s+in\s+Timken\s+carrier\s+bearing\s+width\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+variation\s+in\s+Timken\s+carrier\s+bearing\s+width\?\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width? (score: 1): Author: Jason Sukey <jsukey@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:59:04 -0400; --==2618444037927873658== --94eb2c11898ad852df053da50a66 Has anyone else noticed rather large variation in carrier bearing width's when rebuilding a spitfire differential? The one I'm building right; /html/fot/2016-09/msg00177.html (10,584 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width? (score: 1): Author: fubog1 <fubog1@aol.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:50:42 -0400; --==5209350997461127214== boundary="--=_Part_25412_249065798.1475164242151" --=_Part_25412_249065798.1475164242151 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yes! I have run into that on several occasions but c; /html/fot/2016-09/msg00178.html (13,954 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width? (score: 1): Author: Jason Sukey <jsukey@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:07:06 -0400; --==2309416009299978997== --001a114ac94a525fd3053da7ab00 Glen, Thanks for the reply. Only goes to reinforce the practice of assuming nothing and measuring everything! Jason --001a114ac94a525fd3053da7; /html/fot/2016-09/msg00179.html (15,608 bytes)
4. Re: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width? (score: 1): Author: John Styduhar <johnstydo@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:52:19 -0400; --==4000486138575271869== --001a11c16a680367b7053da84d06 Some of the USA-stamped Timkens even look cheap when you compare them to the England-made. I wouldn't be surprised if they were made overseas.; /html/fot/2016-09/msg00180.html (14,910 bytes)
5. Re: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width? (score: 1): Author: Jason Sukey <jsukey@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:59:47 -0400; --==2026332148566251070== --001a11c14a5ac00cc8053da867c1 John, Replacing the old bearings because they were worn out. New Timkens seem to be the best available option. Jason --001a11c14a5ac00cc8053da; /html/fot/2016-09/msg00181.html (16,574 bytes)
6. Re: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width? (score: 1): Author: "Peter Vucinic" <pvucinic@netspace.net.au>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:32:05 +1000; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --==5272940839318454201== boundary="--=_NextPart_000_0348_01D21B05.E3E97500" Content-Language: en-au This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_Next; /html/fot/2016-09/msg00182.html (68,408 bytes)
7. Re: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width? (score: 1): Author: malaboge@aol.com; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 21:27:02 -0400; --==8299333838127404395== boundary="--=_Part_38147_9753681.1475198822523" --=_Part_38147_9753681.1475198822523 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jason, Just went thru the same issue with a; /html/fot/2016-09/msg00183.html (13,255 bytes)
8. Re: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width? (score: 1): Author: Aaron Johnson <hpspitfire@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:51:36 +0530; --==1900669449262493441== boundary=Apple-Mail-28D15238-AFDE-4942-BF0D-249FA9D7ABF1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --Apple-Mail-28D15238-AFDE-4942-BF0D-249FA9D7ABF1 charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-; /html/fot/2016-09/msg00184.html (21,317 bytes)
9. Re: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width? (score: 1): Author: Jason Sukey <jsukey@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:21:00 -0400; --001a1143e622c24975053dba4d1e --001a1143e622c24970053dba4d1c Aaron, Funny you should mention this, as I'm currently going round and round with RockAuto. I ordered 6 of the Timken bearings (15123) -; /html/fot/2016-09/msg00186.html (605,228 bytes)
10. Re: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width? (score: 1): Author: "Ashley Page" <apage@prosystembrakes.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 11:32:47 -0400; This is a multipart message in MIME format. --==7380654582416700165== boundary="--=_NextPart_000_0C57_01D21B0E.60571EA0" Content-Language: en-us This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_NextPa; /html/fot/2016-09/msg00187.html (26,994 bytes)
11. Re: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width? (score: 1): Author: fubog1 <fubog1@aol.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 11:40:42 -0400; --==0740589448827695381== boundary="--=_Part_4813_1345054569.1475250042187" --=_Part_4813_1345054569.1475250042187 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This confirms some of the scuttlebutt I've heard, fa; /html/fot/2016-09/msg00188.html (23,171 bytes)
12. Re: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width? (score: 1): Author: Aaron Johnson <hpspitfire@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 21:34:04 +0530; --==7760670145754266798== boundary=Apple-Mail-5346B364-FD0F-4642-B3D0-0C73BAEB0778 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --Apple-Mail-5346B364-FD0F-4642-B3D0-0C73BAEB0778 charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-; /html/fot/2016-09/msg00189.html (29,673 bytes)
13. Re: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width? (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 15:02:52 -0700; Might be worth sending it to Timken. I'm sure they take a very dim view of this sort of thing, and might be willing to replace it "just because". At the very least they should shake up RockAuto a bi; /html/fot/2016-10/msg00000.html (9,327 bytes)
14. Re: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width? (score: 1): Author: Peter Vucinic <pvucinic@netspace.net.au>; Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 09:36:46 +1000; --==2586856587599705606== boundary=Apple-Mail-C7A36C19-7782-4EDE-8BE0-9F062B769A99 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --Apple-Mail-C7A36C19-7782-4EDE-8BE0-9F062B769A99 charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-; /html/fot/2016-10/msg00001.html (28,302 bytes)
15. Re: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width? (score: 1): Author: Michael Porter <mdporter@dfn.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 18:24:53 -0600; Reminiscent of the problems associated with bogus grade 8 hardware entering the aerospace and defense sectors in the late `80s. Then, China wasn't a factor--very little trade with that country at the; /html/fot/2016-10/msg00002.html (11,160 bytes)
16. Re: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width? (score: 1): Author: "Peter Vucinic" <pvucinic@netspace.net.au>; Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 19:49:11 +1000 boundary="----=_NextPart_000_03BC_01D21C1C.E2214960"; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_03BC_01D21C1C.E2214960 boundary="--=_NextPart_001_03BD_01D21C1C.E2214960" --=_NextPart_001_03BD_01D21C1C.E2214960 charset="utf-8" Content; /html/fot/2016-10/msg00004.html (1,179,982 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]