Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+100\-6\/3000\s+top\s+frame\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+100\-6\/3000\s+top\s+frame\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] 100-6/3000 top frame (score: 1): Author: S and T Miller <stmiller96@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:27:19 -0400; Hello all, I am requesting a favor. I bought a late 100-6/ early 3000 top frame from Carlisle Import swap meet this year with the legs cut off. This is the type with the bent legs and tapered bottom; /html/healeys/2011-06/msg00136.html (7,870 bytes)
2. Re: [Healeys] 100-6/3000 top frame (score: 1): Author: Charlie Baldwin <mgcharlie@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 13:18:18 -0400; You can come look at either of mine, get the measurements you need, and make any templates. That is assuming that mine are the same. I have seen others with smaller in cross section tubes that are n; /html/healeys/2011-06/msg00139.html (9,304 bytes)
3. Re: [Healeys] 100-6/3000 top frame (score: 1): Author: Charlie Baldwin <mgcharlie@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:08:09 -0400; Does anyone know at what chassis number a change occurred with the top frames, going from a smaller cross section tube to larger, heavier tubes? There may be a difference in geometry too. This would; /html/healeys/2011-06/msg00142.html (9,315 bytes)
4. Re: [Healeys] 100-6/3000 top frame (score: 1): Author: Derek Job <derek.c.job@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 22:01:05 +0200; The geometry is different. You can see the difference in this photo of the two types of hood frames. The later model is the one on the left with the thicker bars that fit directly in into the same h; /html/healeys/2011-06/msg00149.html (10,899 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]