Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Armrest\s+pad\s+shape\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Armrest\s+pad\s+shape\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] Armrest pad shape (score: 1): Author: john spaur <jmsdarch@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 12:19:18 -0800; I received a new armrest pad that is 5-3/8" wide on one end and 6" wide on the other end. Is this correct? If so, should the fat end face forward or towards the rear of the car on a 1962 MKII BT7 Tha; /html/healeys/2011-01/msg00438.html (6,583 bytes)
2. [Healeys] Armrest pad shape (score: 1): Author: "Peter Svilans" <peter.svilans@rogers.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:41:45 -0500; Yes, those dimensions are correct. The wide end goes to the front. For location on the tunnel carpet, the front edge of the armrest pad sits 1 3/4" back of the ashtray. The left side of the pad is 1; /html/healeys/2011-01/msg00442.html (7,407 bytes)
3. Re: [Healeys] Armrest pad shape (score: 1): Author: john spaur <jmsdarch@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 18:34:07 -0800; I should have known it was correct; it was made by Heritage. Thank you Peter and Rich for the information! Rich added: That shape is correct. The wider portion goes toward the front and it is pulled; /html/healeys/2011-01/msg00443.html (7,633 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]