- 1. Re: [Healeys] Tire Sizes - again (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Blair <rnbmail@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:50:19 -0800 (PST)
- No, you are not reading it correctly - or, it is just one of your cutie I am saying that with 185x15 the car looks more like the factory 'original' non metric size, and, looks better design wise - in
- /html/healeys/2011-01/msg00224.html (8,262 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Healeys] Tire Sizes - again (score: 1)
- Author: "Curt/Nancy Arndt" <cnaarndt@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:04:26 -0800
- I understand your point but 165X15 IS the original radial size for BN2s onward. An no, they do not fill up the wheel well as do the bias ply tires. Actually the 175X15's have the same rolling diamet
- /html/healeys/2011-01/msg00230.html (10,026 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Healeys] Tire Sizes - again (score: 1)
- Author: Derek Job <derek.c.job@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:24:31 +0100
- The 185's are just fatter. They don't fill up the wheel arches heightwise, that all depends on the tire profile. Obviously any kind of modern tyre should be avoided because the profile is too low. T
- /html/healeys/2011-01/msg00244.html (10,094 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Healeys] Tire Sizes - again (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Duquette <robertduquette@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:56:19 -0500
- I read the original tire size as 5.90x15 and googled that. I found this tire chart:http://www.pmcweb.fr/healey/atelier/pneus.htm Home page appears to be here: http://www.pmcweb.fr/healey/index.htmlor
- /html/healeys/2011-01/msg00258.html (10,156 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Healeys] Tire Sizes - again (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Oritt <michael.oritt@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:46:05 -0500
- 165's look too small. 185's look too fat. My 175 Michelins look just Best--Michael Oritt -- _______________________________________________ Healeys@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.h
- /html/healeys/2011-01/msg00272.html (11,636 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu