Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shop\-talk\]\s+Identifying\s+taper\s+and\s+threading\s+attachments\s+on\s+a\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shop\-talk\]\s+Identifying\s+taper\s+and\s+threading\s+attachments\s+on\s+a\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. [Shop-talk] Identifying taper and threading attachments on a (score: 1): Author: TR3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall); Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:59:05 -0700; I agree. And even the threading dial is not strictly necessary. It doesn't work anyway, for some small group of threads. (I forget the rules offhand, but ISTR you can't use it for Whitworth threads.; /html/shop-talk/2011-10/msg00187.html (9,892 bytes)
22. [Shop-talk] Identifying taper and threading attachments on a (score: 1): Author: arvidj at visi.com (Arvid Jedlicka); Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:29:06 -0500; I totally agree, it can be done. I think the original post was "they just chucked a new piece in and cut new threads" and my intent was to suggest why it would might be quicker to just start over. Ar; /html/shop-talk/2011-10/msg00194.html (10,451 bytes)
23. [Shop-talk] Identifying taper and threading attachments on a (score: 1): Author: jszwed at energykinetics.com (Joe Szwed); Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:42:53 -0400; Arvid, Sorry for any confusion. In my original post I was just trying to point out that with using today's cnc equipment, it was faster for the shop to make a new part than fix the first one. With no; /html/shop-talk/2011-10/msg00195.html (9,948 bytes)
24. [Shop-talk] Identifying taper and threading attachments on a (score: 1): Author: neiljsherry at talktalk.net (Neil Sherry); Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:39:16 +0100; My recollection is that for ANY thred you can re-engage the nut on the same point that you were on the dial (eg if you were first engaged on 1 - you can always re-engage on 1). Certain threads can th; /html/shop-talk/2011-10/msg00196.html (10,425 bytes)
25. [Shop-talk] Identifying taper and threading attachments on a (score: 1): Author: TR3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall); Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:51:52 -0700; You got me wondering, so I looked it up. On a lathe with Imperial threads on the leadscrew, engaging on 1 works for any thread that has an integer number of threads in 2 (or 4 for some lathes) inche; /html/shop-talk/2011-10/msg00197.html (10,519 bytes)
26. [Shop-talk] Identifying taper and threading attachments on a (score: 1): Author: TR3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall); Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:53:52 -0700; Not a good idea if your chuck screws onto the headstock (as mine does). -- Randall; /html/shop-talk/2011-10/msg00198.html (8,761 bytes)
27. [Shop-talk] Identifying taper and threading attachments on a (score: 1): Author: neiljsherry at talktalk.net (Neil Sherry); Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:20:40 +0100; /html/shop-talk/2011-10/msg00199.html (12,656 bytes)
28. [Shop-talk] Identifying taper and threading attachments on a (score: 1): Author: neiljsherry at talktalk.net (Neil Sherry); Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:26:00 +0100; ...luckily the lathe in question had a Camlock mounting (and my own lathe has a keyed taper lock mounting).; /html/shop-talk/2011-10/msg00200.html (10,636 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]