- 1. [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Franklin <jamesf@groupwbench.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 09:53:14 -0500
- I'm building a wiring harness for dual horns on a motorcycle. Instead of 2 leads coming off the relay, I'd like to have one lead to one horn, then tap off that for the second horn. I can't find, with
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00069.html (9,097 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: "Eric J Russell" <ejrussell@mebtel.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 22:09:34 -0500 a=enNQ1KVKsPkA:10 a=P2oOn6vrs4wA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=S2wpYzp2RsyRkoRNwqcm1Q==:17 a=C3T0tyzcAAAA:8 a=8GN4XRofAAAA:8 a=tgZQmrZVVE-KmCiERuYA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=Fibl
- I'm not sure exactly what you are seeking. Do you need to be able to connect/disconnect this or is a permanent connection OK? If permanent then solder/heat shrink is a good choice. Anyway, I like to
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00070.html (10,651 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: Brian Kemp <bk13@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 19:44:27 -0800
- Jim - You may be looking for a "piggy back spade connector". Try that in your favorite search engine. See http://www.oreillyauto.com/site/c/detail/CTI0/85412/N0840.oap for some examples that turn a s
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00071.html (11,478 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: Todd Walke <racertod@racertodd.com> localhost.scooter.p.blarg.net
- Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 19:49:39 -0800
- I can think of three options. One is the "piggyback" crimp connector. It's a female spade connector with a male tab added. Example from RadShack: http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00072.html (10,542 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: David Scheidt <dmscheidt@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 22:51:18 -0600
- Another solution, when space is tight, is to use a single wire at the relay, but split it a little ways away. -- David Scheidt dmscheidt@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Shop
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00073.html (10,822 bytes)
- 6. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Franklin <jamesf@groupwbench.org>
- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 09:34:30 -0500
- This is specifically what I was trying to ask - if there was a special connector that would accept and crimp two wires independently. Sounds like no and that the above is the way to go. The piggy-bac
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00076.html (10,201 bytes)
- 7. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: James Stone <jandkstone99@msn.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 10:38:50 -0500
- Why not just solder the connectors on and protect them with heat shrink tubing? That is what I did when I rewired my Alpine last summer. One small diameter piece of tubing over the ferrule end (I thi
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00078.html (11,928 bytes)
- 8. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Franklin <jamesf@groupwbench.org>
- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 10:48:31 -0500
- Do you mean the actual connection so it can't be unplugged? I can't, it needs to stay removable. _______________________________________________ Shop-talk@autox.team.net Archive: http://www.team.net/
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00079.html (10,333 bytes)
- 9. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: Jim <jandkstone99@msn.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 11:49:00 -0500
- No, I meant solder the connector on to the wires rather than just crimp it on. That would give you a more secure connection if you just put two wires into a single connector. Sent from my iPhone wrot
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00080.html (11,851 bytes)
- 10. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: Ronnie Day <ronnie.day@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 11:44:26 -0600
- I've never been a fan of the Scotch-lock connectors that let you tap into an existing wire by crimping them on. They actually cut through the insulation and often some of the wire strands. If there's
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00083.html (14,428 bytes)
- 11. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Franklin <jamesf@groupwbench.org>
- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 13:03:00 -0500
- on. That would give you a more secure connection if you just put two wires into a single connector. Oh yea, I am doing that. Crimp, solder, heat shrink. ______________________________________________
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00084.html (11,016 bytes)
- 12. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: w <wc5813@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 13:06:55 -0500
- That's about what I'd do. Important thing - DO NOT force the electrical connection to do the work of a mechanical connection. Use both. Twist the wires, put in connector, mash with a good crimp tool
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00085.html (11,244 bytes)
- 13. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 10:07:01 -0800
- FWIW, you can also buy just the tubing with the sealer inside. Any good electronics supply should have it, or I get mine at McMaster-Carr. My preference is to start with an uninsulated terminal (cut
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00086.html (11,509 bytes)
- 14. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: "ElanS4" <ElanS4@cox.net>
- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 17:08:16 -0500
- from the vibration better connection It seems that everyone here believes that a soldered joint is better than a crimped one. That is not correct. A crimp connection - if done correctly with a GOOD
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00088.html (12,242 bytes)
- 15. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: w <wc5813@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 18:59:01 -0500
- Good point, and mostly agreed. I understand the brittleness issue with soldering and should have mentioned that. And obviously OEM wiring harnesses are crimped. But that's assuming you have a dedicat
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00089.html (11,584 bytes)
- 16. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 17:50:44 -0800
- Not what I said. What I said is that crimp plus solder is better than either one alone. Mostly because it is cheaper. Years ago, I worked for a company that did minicomputer installations aboard sei
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00090.html (11,799 bytes)
- 17. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: Jim <jandkstone99@msn.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 21:10:31 -0500
- penetrate all the way through the crimp to the other side. Randall: the way you wrote this sounds like you don't want the solder to go all the way to the other side. Is that correct? I made sure all
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00091.html (10,823 bytes)
- 18. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: ml <lotuseuropa@me.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:06:14 -0500
- I won't enter the fray regarding solder or crimping or both - not enough experience on my part to be expert. But Randall's comment below is wrong. If done properly - admittedly a big "if" - crimps ha
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00092.html (11,330 bytes)
- 19. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: Pat Horne <pat@hornesystemstx.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:21:28 -0600
- In the 60s, while in the Air Force, I attended a soldering school that taught us to solder to NASA specs. The problem with soldering wire to that level was with the solder wicking up under the insula
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00094.html (13,147 bytes)
- 20. Re: [Shop-talk] Tapping off a crimp connector? (score: 1)
- Author: Jeff Scarbrough <fishplate@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 15:18:04 -0500
- I think sometimes we might lose sight of the fact that we aren't driving to the Moon in our cars. Yes, MilSpec connecting is a critical science, and must be done exactly as specified. Yes, it works g
- /html/shop-talk/2013-12/msg00097.html (10,989 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu