Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shop\-talk\]\s+direct\s+burial\s+Cat\s+5\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Shop-talk] direct burial Cat 5 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cavanaugh <cavanadd@frontier.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 12:43:33 -0800
I have been fighting with getting Wifi out to my shop building for years. It's about 100 feet from the main house, and it's a metal pole barn so I have to have the Wifi receiver in a window. I am abo
/html/shop-talk/2014-11/msg00043.html (8,957 bytes)

2. Re: [Shop-talk] direct burial Cat 5 (score: 1)
Author: Brian Kemp <bk13@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 14:01:01 -0800
If I did it, I'd run it in PVC conduit. 1/2" conduit is cheap and may even offset the extra cost of direct burial cable. I'd be concerned about a rock or rodent damaging the cable over time. If you a
/html/shop-talk/2014-11/msg00044.html (10,872 bytes)

3. Re: [Shop-talk] direct burial Cat 5 (score: 1)
Author: Trevor Boicey <trevor@boicey.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 17:03:57 -0500
I ran plain old CAT5 outside for years. My plan was "throw it on the bare ground, replace when it stops working". Has not stopped working yet. It's not a safety hazard if it shorts out so not a lot t
/html/shop-talk/2014-11/msg00045.html (11,711 bytes)

4. Re: [Shop-talk] direct burial Cat 5 (score: 1)
Author: eric@megageek.com
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 05:08:48 -0500 7.0.1|January 17, 2006) at 11/17/2014 05:08:53, Serialize complete at 11/17/2014 05:08:53
Dave asks about direct burial Cat 5 I had three separate runs of direct burial and the problem I kept having was lighting killing my equipment on one or both ends. They make special lighting arrester
/html/shop-talk/2014-11/msg00046.html (8,736 bytes)

5. [Shop-talk] direct burial Cat 5 (score: 1)
Author: Mark Miller <markmiller@threeboysfarm.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:06:42 -0800
<<< I have been fighting with getting Wifi out to my shop building for years. It's about 100 feet from the main house, and it's a metal pole barn so I have to have the Wifi receiver in a window. I am
/html/shop-talk/2014-11/msg00047.html (10,063 bytes)

6. Re: [Shop-talk] direct burial Cat 5 (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Scarbrough <fishplate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 07:35:08 -0500
This can be a good solution, but if your shop is like mine, fed from a different transformer, this probably won't work. As for the OP, perhaps a better antenna connected to the WiFi receiver would he
/html/shop-talk/2014-11/msg00048.html (9,089 bytes)

7. Re: [Shop-talk] direct burial Cat 5 (score: 1)
Author: "Tim ." <tims_datsun_stuff@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 07:00:08 -0600
"Powerline Ethernet" The write up says "Consumes only 0.5 watts of power in stand-by mode." Wonder how high this goes under high usage. But I really wonder is how this would do in an old house that s
/html/shop-talk/2014-11/msg00049.html (8,863 bytes)

8. Re: [Shop-talk] direct burial Cat 5 (score: 1)
Author: David Scheidt <dmscheidt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:22:04 -0600
The one I watched with a meter used about 2 watts averaged out over a few days. I didn't watch for power use under load, though. But I really There's no reason they wouldn't work. They work by puttin
/html/shop-talk/2014-11/msg00050.html (9,626 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu