Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shop\-talk\]\s+testing\s+coaxial\s+cable\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shop\-talk\]\s+testing\s+coaxial\s+cable\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Shop-talk] testing coaxial cable (score: 1): Author: "John Niolon" <jniolon@att.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 06:37:20 -0500; I know there are some hams or experienced RF people on here so here's the question for them. I'm getting my old ham gear (only VHF and UHF) and getting some emergency communication ability back. I've; /html/shop-talk/2013-10/msg00030.html (8,433 bytes)
2. Re: [Shop-talk] testing coaxial cable (score: 1): Author: Dave Caroline <dave.thearchivist@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 13:02:54 +0100; good sign need a better load possibly Measure power in and at the output end, what is the loss per length does it match the spec for the cable at that frequency. You only get reflected power if there; /html/shop-talk/2013-10/msg00031.html (10,493 bytes)
3. Re: [Shop-talk] testing coaxial cable (score: 1): Author: Doug Braun <doug@dougbraun.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:03:25 -0400; You could put the SWR meter right after the transmitter, hook up the cable to its output, leave the far end open, and see that the reflected power is the same as the forward power. Then do it again w; /html/shop-talk/2013-10/msg00032.html (8,746 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]