- 1. [TR] Antennea body holes (score: 1)
- Author: Patrick Huckels <bespokeroadsters@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 14:53:43 +0000 (UTC)
- --==8786964973760210416== boundary="--=_Part_6929684_519396951.1433516023233" --=_Part_6929684_519396951.1433516023233 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all.I've always wondered if th
- /html/triumphs/2015-06/msg00044.html (9,810 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TR] Antennea body holes (score: 1)
- Author: "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 09:58:31 -0700
- I can't claim this is definitive, but it appears to me that up until 1958-59, there was no factory-supported program for dealers to fit radios to the TR2-3, and very few cars seem to have been fitte
- /html/triumphs/2015-06/msg00049.html (10,712 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TR] Antennea body holes (score: 1)
- Author: "John Macartney" <john.macartney@ukpips.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 22:18:17 +0100
- It was always possible to order any Standard or Triumph car from the factory with a fitted radio but they were not line fitments. North American models would have had AM (obviously?) in the Medium wa
- /html/triumphs/2015-06/msg00080.html (11,070 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu