- 1. [TR] spitfire and GT6 (score: 1)
- Author: Frank Fisher <yellowtr3@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:40:47 +0000 (UTC)
- --==8263854149363881978== boundary="--=_Part_3712798_2102501033.1563986447449" --=_Part_3712798_2102501033.1563986447449 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit looking at grouping some of the triumphs for a
- /html/triumphs/2019-07/msg00157.html (9,721 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TR] Spitfire and GT6 (score: 1)
- Author: Frank Magnusson <fmags@cox.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 19:26:32 -0500
- Hi Frank, as far as how similar the cars are, they are really not. Although they look similar and the GT6 just looks like a fastback couple version of the Spitfire, its anything but. Very few parts t
- /html/triumphs/2019-07/msg00163.html (8,932 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TR] Spitfire and GT6 (score: 1)
- Author: Paul Tegler <ptegler@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 23:20:37 -0400
- Frank (et al)... the MKIII went back to the swing axle, but with larger rear drum brakes AKA using the same self adjusting system as the MGC. Late MKI and MKIIs were roto-flex independent suspension.
- /html/triumphs/2019-07/msg00167.html (10,513 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TR] Spitfire and GT6 (score: 1)
- Author: Frank Magnus son <fmags@cox.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 07:59:15 -0500
- Not to get too far into the weeds as its beyond the original post, but on the GT6 Mk III, most of them had the rotoflex rear suspension. Only the last bit of production in the final year went back to
- /html/triumphs/2019-07/msg00170.html (11,929 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TR] Spitfire and GT6 (score: 1)
- Author: Mark J Bradakis <mark@bradakis.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:01:05 -0600
- On a side note, all the roundtail Spits and GTs, along with the TR4,4A,5,250 and 6 all use the same windshield. As a matter of fact the Killer Spit has the windshield and windshield frame taken fro
- /html/triumphs/2019-07/msg00171.html (8,855 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu