Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Anti\-Seize\s+on\s+Spark\s+Plugs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Anti\-Seize\s+on\s+Spark\s+Plugs\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: Jay Laifman <jay.laifman@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:51:22 -0700; Every car guy should watch this! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zw7d8B8ETw&feature=player_embedded Jay _______________________________________________ tigers@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.n; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00182.html (11,854 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: Sandy Ganz <sganz@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:22:40 -0700 (PDT); The guy must have used a huge amount of Anti-sieze. Some of the technical information seemed off until the 'Engineer' got on the video. I love the example of the anti-sieze brush as that is what both; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00183.html (13,561 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <lpaulick1@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:43:58 -0400; Jay, well done, but he should have emphasized that anti-seize is necessary on dissimilar metals, like an steel spark plug and an alum head, which is very common today. I would have liked him to show; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00184.html (13,379 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: Gary Winblad <garywinblad@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:10:16 +0000 (UTC); Yup.. another "don't do this at home, better pay a professional" commercial. I have been using anti-seize on mine since my 1981 RX-7 required it... and have never had a problem, of course you have to; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00185.html (13,919 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: Larry Mayfield <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:17:54 -0700; Intersting...but, I am throwing the BS flag on this one. When the plug was fires, in this case, and the spark arcs under the boot to the metal case, it is done. The case with its tapered seat grounds; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00186.html (15,007 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:30:59 -0500; Agreed on all counts... I used to use a bit of engine oil on the plug threads, but a dab of antiseize is, to me, that much more effective, especially when threading plugs into aluminum heads. I still; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00187.html (15,754 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: Sandy Ganz <sganz@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:03:30 -0700 (PDT); Yes, same page you just said it better ;) And again, likely started with a cracked spark plug not antiseize... maybe he 'over torqued' the plug and stretched the threads... Ok, still useful to keep t; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00190.html (17,929 bytes)
8. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:32:39 -0400; Spark plug torque Tapered plug - snug + 1/8 turn Washer style - snug + 1/4 turn This seems to be the norm for spark plugs. Tiger Shop Manual - Section B - Page 70 - torque = 15 - 20 ft lbs Ron Fraser; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00191.html (15,823 bytes)
9. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: genepadgett@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 01:13:32 +0000 (UTC); Just a caution to all about specific torque figures. The 15 - 20 ft- lb figure in the shop manual is probably a dry torque figure. Anti-sieze on the threads acts as a lubricant. It will result in a c; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00193.html (16,406 bytes)
10. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: Larry Mayfield <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:22:23 -0700; Interesting..torque specs weren't up front in the head specs... Thanks, I stand corrected. I will no go out and torque the plugs in the Tiger to 17.5 ft-lbs...is that with or without lube? mayf _____; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00194.html (17,596 bytes)
11. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: Sandy Ganz <sganz@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:35:44 -0700 (PDT); Well given it was a 60's ford, the engineers would have definintly accounted oil leaking out of the valve covers so it may be with oil... Ok, I have had enough fun for one day :) Sandy ______________; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00195.html (20,061 bytes)
12. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: "Curt Hoffman" <choffman9@cinci.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:27:13 -0700; Very common automotive blog material as to whether torque is affected by anti-sieze. Shows up on every car list I am on. I have seen engineering papers written on it. I personally, also being an engi; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00196.html (14,197 bytes)
13. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:39:18 -0700; Sounds like there is a need to create a spark plug stretch gauge. :-) Tom _______________________________________________ tigers@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http:/; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00197.html (12,598 bytes)
14. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: genepadgett@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 05:50:09 +0000 (UTC); Curt, my gin and tonic is encouraging me to reply :>) I intended my post to focus on the real objective of determining "how tight" the plug should be. Torque is a proxy for that clamping force and fo; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00198.html (14,193 bytes)
15. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: Larry Mayfield <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:07:27 -0700; H*ll yeah! Score 10 for a good answer! I want one of your gin and tonics, lol.... But Harleys use aluminum heads and in truth do need an anti seize because the instance of plug to head galling after; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00200.html (17,985 bytes)
16. [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: Jay Laifman <jay.laifman@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:51:22 -0700; Every car guy should watch this! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zw7d8B8ETw&feature=player_embedded Jay _______________________________________________ tigers@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.n; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00279.html (11,472 bytes)
17. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: Sandy Ganz <sganz@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:22:40 -0700 (PDT); The guy must have used a huge amount of Anti-sieze. Some of the technical information seemed off until the 'Engineer' got on the video. I love the example of the anti-sieze brush as that is what both; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00280.html (13,462 bytes)
18. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <lpaulick1@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:43:58 -0400; Jay, well done, but he should have emphasized that anti-seize is necessary on dissimilar metals, like an steel spark plug and an alum head, which is very common today. I would have liked him to show; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00281.html (13,526 bytes)
19. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: Gary Winblad <garywinblad@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:10:16 +0000 (UTC); Yup.. another "don't do this at home, better pay a professional" commercial. I have been using anti-seize on mine since my 1981 RX-7 required it... and have never had a problem, of course you have to; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00282.html (14,693 bytes)
20. Re: [Tigers] Anti-Seize on Spark Plugs (score: 1): Author: Larry Mayfield <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:17:54 -0700; Intersting...but, I am throwing the BS flag on this one. When the plug was fires, in this case, and the spark arcs under the boot to the metal case, it is done. The case with its tapered seat grounds; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00283.html (15,668 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]