- 1. [Tigers] CT Tiger - past owner identified (score: 1)
- Author: snakebit289 <snakebit289@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 04:20:21 -0700
- Shelby-Powered Tiger Leads this Euro Rally Lineup | Petrolicious Some of you remembers this video from, maybe, two months ago. I found out tonight that the Tiger is the same car that once belonged to
- /html/tigers/2014-07/msg00030.html (10,030 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Tigers] CT Tiger - past owner identified (score: 1)
- Author: Al <twojohnsons@cox.net>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 09:28:22 -0400
- Way back when, that same car had 2 4-barrel Carters that looked and ran sweeeeeet! Sent from my iPhone the Johnsons Africa brought to than a both http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/twojohns
- /html/tigers/2014-07/msg00031.html (11,885 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Tigers] CT Tiger - past owner identified (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Mo Christopherson" <JCMC2006@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:26:45 -0500
- I noticed that this particular Tiger was built on the same date as mine (April 1,1965), however it was registered as a 1966 model, where mine is 1965, can someone enlighten me? Jerry Christopherson 9
- /html/tigers/2014-07/msg00032.html (11,390 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Tigers] CT Tiger - past owner identified (score: 1)
- Author: genepadgett@comcast.net
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 23:28:27 +0000 (UTC)
- Jerry, it seems to have been pretty common practice back in the 60's to register the car year as the year it was sold. I bought my Mark IA new from a dealer in October 1967 and it was registered as a
- /html/tigers/2014-07/msg00034.html (13,169 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Tigers] CT Tiger - past owner identified (score: 1)
- Author: Gary Winblad <garywinblad@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 01:33:02 +0000 (UTC)
- YES. And it is well known that when the Tigers came in on the boats, they were just parked in a warehouse, newer ones got in front of the older ones. When the dealers ordered a red one, they just pul
- /html/tigers/2014-07/msg00035.html (14,349 bytes)
- 6. Re: [Tigers] CT Tiger - past owner identified (score: 1)
- Author: CoolVT@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 22:01:57 -0400 (EDT)
- Most of the dealers had their inventory financed. My wife worked at a bank and handled this financing for a few of the dealers of foreign cars.....MG's, Austins, etc. When the new American cars came
- /html/tigers/2014-07/msg00036.html (13,282 bytes)
- 7. Re: [Tigers] CT Tiger - past owner identified (score: 1)
- Author: Owain Lloyd <owain.lloyd@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 22:32:45 -0400
- Yep. My dec 65 built tiger is registered 67 too. Pretty cool you bought it new. How many owners still own a tiger they bought new I wonder. What a story. _____________________________________________
- /html/tigers/2014-07/msg00037.html (14,987 bytes)
- 8. Re: [Tigers] CT Tiger - past owner identified (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 20:02:30 -0700
- And for some (here in Calif.) it was a dreadful thing. There was a time when California required all cars 1966 and newer to pass a biannual smog test. So, I'm sure there were many "1965" Tigers that
- /html/tigers/2014-07/msg00038.html (10,212 bytes)
- 9. Re: [Tigers] CT Tiger - past owner identified (score: 1)
- Author: "Andy Walker" <awtiger@cox.net>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 07:49:29 -0500
- Gene, et al: Same thing happened with my Tiger. The car was built squarely withing the 1966 model year production, but wasn't sold new until '67. Therefore, it carries "1967" on its title. Andy Walke
- /html/tigers/2014-07/msg00039.html (13,727 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu