Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Calif\s+plates\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Calif\s+plates\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Calif plates (score: 1): Author: <johnp@ciseast.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 12:51:06 -0400; My Tiger was bought on Dec. 28, 1965 (as a 1966 model based on foreign model years scheme devised by the state) from the dealer in Vallejo, California with plate "RXF 371". This number goes against s; /html/tigers/2014-10/msg00035.html (9,040 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Calif plates (score: 1): Author: Douglas Lyle <douglasalyle@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 10:22:58 -0700; John, you hit the mail on the head on this. The smaller DMV's might never go through a stack of plates. Take for instance a city with multiple car dealerships. When they sell a car they have to take; /html/tigers/2014-10/msg00036.html (12,395 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Calif plates (score: 1): Author: genepadgett@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 19:22:45 +0000 (UTC); FWIW, another (extreme?) example is the plate I got through the dealer on my brand new Tiger in 1967. The plate number was HBN 810. Gene -- Original Message -- My Tiger was bought on Dec. 28, 1965 (a; /html/tigers/2014-10/msg00039.html (10,766 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] Calif plates (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@garmin.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 02:54:41 +0000; In Alberta itb s still that way... I have something like five or six plates and if I can, I transfer them from one vehicle to the next (or bring an idle one out of retirement). Makes it easier to rem; /html/tigers/2014-10/msg00043.html (10,247 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]