- 1. [Tigers] Distributor Performance (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert D. Hogan" <robertdhogan@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:37:01 -0400
- Is there any performance advantage of a Ford dual point distributor over a Pertronix electronically triggered distributor. There certainly can't be a maintenance advantage to a dual point, so is a du
- /html/tigers/2014-08/msg00085.html (8,727 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Tigers] Distributor Performance (score: 1)
- Author: "wseay" <wseay@embarqmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 11:11:56 -0400
- The objective of the dual-point distributor is to increase dwell to get a larger spark. With the Pertronix you get the increased dwell with none of the disadvantages of the mechanical point set in th
- /html/tigers/2014-08/msg00086.html (11,781 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Tigers] Distributor Performance (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Josten <bob@rjosten.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:09:40 -0700
- What about installing the Pertronix setup in a dual point distributor? Bob J. _______________________________________________ tigers@autox.team.net Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: h
- /html/tigers/2014-08/msg00087.html (12,288 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Tigers] Distributor Performance (score: 1)
- Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 12:52:38 -0400
- Bob Pertronix lists a unit for dual point distributors and it probably provides a very stable dwell time. This part will take some of the maintenance out of the distributor. The question becomes what
- /html/tigers/2014-08/msg00088.html (10,025 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Tigers] Distributor Performance (score: 1)
- Author: "Rense, Mark (GE, Appl & Light)" <mark.rense@ge.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:22:09 +0000
- I've been running a Pertronix Ignitor II in a dual-point for many years on my 289 car and it has been stone reliable. This includes track day adventures. My 331 car has a complete Pertronix Flame-Thr
- /html/tigers/2014-08/msg00089.html (14,381 bytes)
- 6. Re: [Tigers] Distributor Performance (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Josten <bob@rjosten.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 11:13:19 -0700
- Hi Mark and Ron, I use Pertronix in a couple of my stock cars and also have the MSD box and distributor in my street tiger. I like both setups, both have been really reliable and it's really nice not
- /html/tigers/2014-08/msg00090.html (16,795 bytes)
- 7. Re: [Tigers] Distributor Performance (score: 1)
- Author: "lists" <lists@brits-n-pieces.com>
- Date: 26 Aug 2014 09:28:23 +0200
- You might consider a 123ignition system, which gives you the advantage of not having to adjust points and being able to implement 2 advance curves (centrifugal and vacuum 2 each) and 2 rev limiters v
- /html/tigers/2014-08/msg00093.html (10,139 bytes)
- 8. Re: [Tigers] Distributor Performance (score: 1)
- Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@garmin.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:39:51 +0000
- Cool product, but when will you have one that works with a Ford distributor? If anyone is interested I have a MSD E-curve distributor sitting in my garage, new in the box - likely I wonb t ever use i
- /html/tigers/2014-08/msg00094.html (12,914 bytes)
- 9. Re: [Tigers] Distributor Performance (score: 1)
- Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:11:26 -0400
- Bob I agree the Pertronix has been very reliable. I think I installed mine about 1980. Mechanical advance is for performance Vacuum advance gives you economy on the highway Ford has what I call 2 sty
- /html/tigers/2014-08/msg00095.html (11,079 bytes)
- 10. Re: [Tigers] Distributor Performance (score: 1)
- Author: "lists" <lists@brits-n-pieces.com>
- Date: 27 Aug 2014 09:19:33 +0200
- Hi Theo, we already have one working with Ford distributors. If interested call us. Phone number is on our website www.brits-n-pieces.com Regards Eric b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b
- /html/tigers/2014-08/msg00096.html (10,620 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu