Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Distributor\s+vacuum\s+line\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 16:38:40 -0400
Tiger Trivia and facts plus I'm just curious I noticed something interesting recently. The stock Tiger distributor vacuum hard line only has a Rootes part number; 1224812. There is no Ford part numbe
/html/tigers/2013-06/msg00291.html (10,159 bytes)

2. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: genepadgett@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 22:58:24 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Ron, I measured it at exactly 25 inches. I used a piece of solid core electrical wire, molded to the vacuum line and periodically taped to it to hold in place, then detached it, straightened it, a
/html/tigers/2013-06/msg00293.html (11,227 bytes)

3. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 19:18:25 -0400
Gene Any information helps. You measured the full length of the vacuum line, correct and this was an original Tiger part. (?) My theory is that Rooted took up to 1/2" off the tube length at the distr
/html/tigers/2013-06/msg00294.html (11,863 bytes)

4. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: genepadgett@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 23:43:31 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Ron, Yes, full length measured absolute tip to tip. Original line, off the car and retrieved from storage shelf for measurement. BTW, any idea where one can get a fitting for the end that goes int
/html/tigers/2013-06/msg00295.html (12,885 bytes)

5. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: CoolVT@aol.com
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 20:32:07 -0400 (EDT)
If a guy was to go into his wife's sewing box he would find a cloth measuring tape that makes measuring odd shapes a snap:-) Mark L In a message dated 6/30/2013 7:19:46 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, rf
/html/tigers/2013-06/msg00296.html (12,309 bytes)

6. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: genepadgett@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 00:44:51 +0000 (UTC)
I tried to do it first using 1/2 inch wide masking tape to follow the twists and turns, much like a cloth measuring tape with the further advantage of adhesive to hold it in place. With all the twist
/html/tigers/2013-06/msg00297.html (13,095 bytes)

7. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 21:37:24 -0400
Thank Gene I was looking at the end fittings. I could not find the Ford part number but I did find a description. Maybe someone on the List knows the Ford part number for this fitting. The fitting ar
/html/tigers/2013-06/msg00298.html (10,812 bytes)

8. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: genepadgett@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 02:12:55 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Ron, Thanks very much. I greatly appreciate the info. I had given up on find these! Gene Message Thank Gene I was looking at the end fittings. I could not find the Ford part number but I did find
/html/tigers/2013-06/msg00299.html (11,201 bytes)

9. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: Gary Winblad <garywinblad@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 03:13:03 +0000 (UTC)
Gene. On the original distributor, the entire fitting you need just unscrews. At least in about 1992 when I did my rebuild, I was able to get a new diaphram that allowed it to screw in. When you unsc
/html/tigers/2013-06/msg00301.html (12,002 bytes)

10. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: Gary Winblad <garywinblad@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 03:15:29 +0000 (UTC)
Oops.. disregard that last post.. you want to adapt to rubber line.... sorry. Gary -- Original Message -- From: Gary Winblad <garywinblad@comcast.net> To: genepadgett@comcast.net Cc: tigers@autox.tea
/html/tigers/2013-06/msg00302.html (12,370 bytes)

11. [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:12:42 -0400
I've been looking into why the distributor vacuum line only has a Rootes part number. Rootes either modified the Ford part or they made them in England; I'm just curious which is true. I've had a cou
/html/tigers/2013-07/msg00044.html (9,432 bytes)

12. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Rense" <mark44124@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 10:29:27 -0400
Ron, I analyzed the original vacuum line off B382001465 by applying complex String Field Theory. In other words, I ran a string from one end to the other while standing out in my field. The line is s
/html/tigers/2013-07/msg00045.html (10,651 bytes)

13. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 11:06:28 -0400
Mark I like your Complex String Field Theory. Thank you for the pictures. Ron Ron, I analyzed the original vacuum line off B382001465 by applying complex String Field Theory. In other words, I ran a
/html/tigers/2013-07/msg00046.html (9,768 bytes)

14. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: Larry Mayfield <drmayf@mayfco.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:19:18 -0700
The dizzy vacuum line on my MKI is original so I will remove it and measure. Now, as to PN where on the line is that located? While I wont use advanced string theory to measure it, I will use proper
/html/tigers/2013-07/msg00049.html (11,251 bytes)

15. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:06:06 -0400
Mayf There is no PN physically marked on the line. My curiosity got the best of me when I noticed there is only a Rootes part number listed in the Parts List for the vacuum line. I always thought it
/html/tigers/2013-07/msg00053.html (12,160 bytes)

16. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: Larry Mayfield <drmayf@mayfco.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:46:48 -0700
Well, dang, my vacuum line is not original or even stock. Has been a long time since I doodled with it though so forgive me.... Somewhere in swapping engines returning to stoick swapping yet again et
/html/tigers/2013-07/msg00059.html (11,428 bytes)

17. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 20:27:41 -0400
Mayf Thank you for checking Thanks Ron Fraser Well, dang, my vacuum line is not original or even stock. Has been a long time since I doodled with it though so forgive me.... Somewhere in swapping eng
/html/tigers/2013-07/msg00063.html (11,913 bytes)

18. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: David or Gary Franchi <wwwdg@webtv.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:13:51 GMT FILETIME=[39753420:01CE8250]
I believe the reason there is no Ford part number shown in the Tiger parts book is Ford didn't service the vacuum line. The Ford parts book for 1960 to 1964 (link below) and the 1965 to 1972 both sta
/html/tigers/2013-07/msg00066.html (10,278 bytes)

19. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:36:59 -0400
David You maybe totally correct that there was no service part and that is why Rootes listed no Ford part number. As I have stated I was curious so I dug into this issue to see what I could find. The
/html/tigers/2013-07/msg00068.html (11,537 bytes)

20. Re: [Tigers] Distributor vacuum line (score: 1)
Author: "Will Seay" <wseay@embarqmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 19:28:57 -0400
Ron, I don't know if you'll consider this to be helpful or not, but anyway.. I measured the length of the original vacuum line on B382001570. It came to 26 1/8" +/- about 1/4". This is an end-to-end
/html/tigers/2013-07/msg00071.html (11,258 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu