Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Feedback\s+on\s+nisonger\s+instruments\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Feedback on nisonger instruments (score: 1)
Author: Owain Lloyd <owain.lloyd@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:50:35 -0400
Over the years I've heard that these are the guys for rebuilding smiths instruments but never needed them as I tend to get gauges done from a great cheap guy in the uk. I recently had them convert my
/html/tigers/2012-11/msg00014.html (9,409 bytes)

2. Re: [Tigers] Feedback on nisonger instruments (score: 1)
Author: CoolVT@aol.com
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 14:03:26 -0400 (EDT)
I had them do a speedometer. It came out extremely accurate, but they left a white spot of something on the inside of the glass. It was a small deal, but not what I expected from a company that prett
/html/tigers/2012-11/msg00015.html (10,380 bytes)

3. Re: [Tigers] Feedback on nisonger instruments (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laurinaitis <laurin212@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 15:51:56 -0400
i had them rebuild all my tiger gauges, did nice work overall, but did leave some plastic blast media or glass scrapings inside a few of the instruments ______________________________________________
/html/tigers/2012-11/msg00016.html (9,871 bytes)

4. Re: [Tigers] Feedback on nisonger instruments (score: 1)
Author: Owain Lloyd <owain.lloyd@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 17:07:50 -0400
Guess I should have solicited recommendations first. Pity because they are obviously very capable. Its a shame when you pay for a job you could do better yourself though. They are not particularly fr
/html/tigers/2012-11/msg00017.html (10,682 bytes)

5. Re: [Tigers] Feedback on nisonger instruments (score: 1)
Author: "Jim" <jimmc13@hughes.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 17:25:17 -0500
Folks; I had Peter Bayer rebuild my Tiger clock and Smiths Tach. My experience is they do great work, the instruments look excellent. This is sometimes difficult to do, but I have to recommend that y
/html/tigers/2012-11/msg00019.html (11,252 bytes)

6. Re: [Tigers] Feedback on nisonger instruments (score: 1)
Author: Marc James Small <marcsmall@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 21:29:34 -0400
Marc msmall@aya.yale.edu Cha robh b`s fir gun ghr`s fir! _______________________________________________ tigers@autox.team.net Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/
/html/tigers/2012-11/msg00023.html (10,136 bytes)

7. Re: [Tigers] Feedback on nisonger instruments (score: 1)
Author: Owain Lloyd <owain.lloyd@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 21:46:46 -0400
Your opinion doesn't count Marc. _______________________________________________ tigers@autox.team.net Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/m
/html/tigers/2012-11/msg00024.html (11,711 bytes)

8. Re: [Tigers] Feedback on nisonger instruments (score: 1)
Author: Marc James Small <marcsmall@comcast.net> mail.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:03:36 -0400
That is a rather rude comment, brother Owain. Share with us why you feel the way you seem to feel? I am a rather pleasant person with a lot of knowledge about the original Rootes system. Marc It is a
/html/tigers/2012-11/msg00025.html (10,797 bytes)

9. Re: [Tigers] Feedback on nisonger instruments (score: 1)
Author: "Buck Trippel" <BuckTrippel@Verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 19:10:41 -0700
Perhaps Marc, the reason for Owain's reply is rooted in your demonstrated ability to formulate opinions that completely disregard the facts. pardon me for jumping in, Buck Trippel ___________________
/html/tigers/2012-11/msg00026.html (12,292 bytes)

10. Re: [Tigers] Feedback on nisonger instruments (score: 1)
Author: Marc James Small <marcsmall@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:19:02 -0400
Thanks, Buck, for your commentary. I have a long history with Nisonger, going back to the '60's, but not one so constant that they would know me. All I did in my post was to point out that Nisonger w
/html/tigers/2012-11/msg00027.html (11,557 bytes)

11. Re: [Tigers] Feedback on nisonger instruments (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 19:37:34 -0700
It seems sir you omitted a third fact. You implied that those who did not agree with you were "nit-pickers." Likely that is the source of the consternation. _________________________________________
/html/tigers/2012-11/msg00028.html (12,388 bytes)

12. Re: [Tigers] Feedback on nisonger instruments (score: 1)
Author: Marc James Small <marcsmall@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 23:10:46 -0400
A fine point, and thank you. I always have had most wonderful service from Nisonger, dating back to the early 1970's. I find comments about spattering of paint on the glass a matter of contacting the
/html/tigers/2012-11/msg00029.html (11,575 bytes)

13. Re: [Tigers] Feedback on nisonger instruments (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laurinaitis <laurin212@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 00:01:56 -0400
no one is griping, but folks asked for an opinion, so we served up our experiences. i would probably use them again, but in terms of your comment "Instead of griping, demand perfection. It really is
/html/tigers/2012-11/msg00032.html (12,608 bytes)

14. Re: [Tigers] Feedback on nisonger instruments (score: 1)
Author: Marc James Small <marcsmall@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:25:27 -0400
Thank you, Peter; I had not realized that I was on a Canadian list. (he grins: I am a member of several Canadian lists where 'I disagree' is regarded as an unseemly word). I call the shots as I see t
/html/tigers/2012-11/msg00033.html (12,809 bytes)

15. Re: [Tigers] Feedback on nisonger instruments (score: 1)
Author: Owain Lloyd <owain.lloyd@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 00:38:54 -0400
As you may have noticed... - I'm not. And, much as I appreciate your support, I encourage the rest of you not to be baited either. We've all got better things to do.... Next subject please! _________
/html/tigers/2012-11/msg00034.html (14,471 bytes)

16. Re: [Tigers] Feedback on nisonger instruments (score: 1)
Author: Marc James Small <marcsmall@comcast.net> mail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 05:42:43 -0500
You are mouthing gibberish, Owain. I was not 'baiting' anyone. I simply stated my own experience with Nisonger. If you regard everyone who has an experience different than yours as 'baiting' you, the
/html/tigers/2012-11/msg00035.html (11,699 bytes)

17. Re: [Tigers] Feedback on nisonger instruments (score: 1)
Author: CoolVT@aol.com
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 09:08:38 -0500 (EST)
The 3 people that have commented on the "Less than perfect job" of Nisonger, myself included, have mentioned that the dissatisfaction with service has been in the cosmetic end of the product. It seem
/html/tigers/2012-11/msg00038.html (11,924 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu