Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+More\s+random\s+questions\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+More\s+random\s+questions\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] More random questions... (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Feit" <jeff@feitmail.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:51:43 -0400; Thanks for the replies. Just getting back to this. You are all correct that it is indeed a MK1, not a MK1A. hard boot and all. After getting apart, it has an aluminum front cover and an aluminum wate; /html/tigers/2013-06/msg00085.html (8,323 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] More random questions... (score: 1): Author: <e.coiner@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:30:16 -0700; Yes the motor mounts are Ford. You want 64.5 or 65 motor mounts for a small block Ford _______________________________________________ tigers@autox.team.net Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Unsub; /html/tigers/2013-06/msg00092.html (9,493 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] More random questions... (score: 1): Author: Tom Parker <tkparker1941@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:08:18 -0400; Jeff, The usual Ford mounts are 2220 / 2221 if memory serves, and they're "iffy". Look back on the list posts, there was a U.S. manufacturer listed that MAY have more accurate mounts. This was from l; /html/tigers/2013-06/msg00093.html (11,774 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]