Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Standard\s+vs\.\s+GT\s+Interior\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Standard\s+vs\.\s+GT\s+Interior\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Standard vs. GT Interior (score: 1): Author: Rollright@aol.com; Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 10:24:59 -0400 (EDT); Hello, I want to admit making a very expensive mistake, and in doing so, help others avoid this thoughtless error. My intention was to re-chrome the chrome-plated pot-metal 'finishers' just below the; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00079.html (11,349 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Standard vs. GT Interior (score: 1): Author: "Scattt" <scattt@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 11:24:07 -0400; Jim: All the Tigers with the non Gt interiors use the same smaller finishers. -- Original Message -- From: <Rollright@aol.com> To: <tigers@Autox.Team.Net> Cc: <onegonefish@comcast.net>; <todbrown@roa; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00080.html (12,556 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Standard vs. GT Interior (score: 1): Author: michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 01:36:14 +1000; Jim, While i will say thanks for the warning.. not all Tigers used the wider/deeper GT style !/4 window finshers. The early tigers, round bonnet/door/boot cars used the ST smaller alpine ST style fin; /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00081.html (13,538 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]