Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Thinking\s+Ahead\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Thinking\s+Ahead\.\.\.\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: Larry Mayfield <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 07:15:06 -0700; Considerations for a future year motors for the Salt Flats car. Just some thoughts and interest questions... What are choices for a twin or sohc engine just under 3 liters? all motor ideas (ie no pow; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00116.html (10,008 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:41:45 +0000; For a sub-2-liter engine, the Honda S2000 engine might cut it... You would need to look a how much higher you could safely push the redline to get more than the stock 240 hp though. The mx-3 v6 at 1.; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00117.html (12,178 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: Owain Lloyd <owain.lloyd@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:46:39 -0400; For the n/a 4cly 2.0 either a Millington or a BDG would be my top choices. Otherwise a BMW S14 can make over 300hp but might not be cheaper at those outputs. All fantastic engines but not cheap. On t; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00118.html (11,962 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:50:14 +0000; How about chain-driving two 1000cc motorcycle engines together? Out of the box you'd be near 300 hp. It would sound completely awesome as well. Theo http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/theo.; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00119.html (14,526 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: "michael@michaelshortt.com" <michaelsavga@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:08:10 -0400; Best source for parts https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/advcat.asp?CategoryID=ENGINE Ford 2000cc with 285hp http://supertouring.net/ford-volvo-btcc-saug-rennmotor-race-engine-ca-2000cc-285bhp/ 2.0 ze; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00120.html (15,357 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: Owain Lloyd <owain.lloyd@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:15:01 -0400; Ah yes - of course the Zetec would be best bang for buck. 280hp is cheap as chips from a Zetec. _______________________________________________ tigers@autox.team.net Archive: http://www.team.net/arch; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00121.html (17,515 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: "Teepen, Jere" <jteepen@usatoday.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:44:45 -0400; What class are you thinking of running the car in? Considerations for a future year motors for the Salt Flats car. Just some thoughts and interest questions... What are choices for a twin or sohc eng; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00122.html (11,342 bytes)
8. Re: [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: "Sigma Engineering" <sigmaengr@carolina.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:10:08 -0400; I have a bone stock 1996 2.0 zetec sitting in my garage....only 250 miles since new. _______________________________________________ tigers@autox.team.net Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Unsubsc; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00123.html (19,265 bytes)
9. Re: [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 19:39:08 -0700; I've got one of those sitting on the patio from when I put a 2.3 - turbo in my Pinto. Wow, 300 HP. The 2.0 was pretty gutless behind a C-4 in stock tune. Buddy Ingersoll sure knew how to get power o; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00125.html (10,023 bytes)
10. Re: [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: Owain Lloyd <owain.lloyd@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 23:17:00 -0400; Certainly gutless in stock form, however..... Read Vizard - ford SOHC. That was published in '83. Times have moved on even further since. The pinto, being used in the rs2000, is still very actively t; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00126.html (11,809 bytes)
11. Re: [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: "Mark Rense" <mark44124@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 09:54:32 -0400; The latest M-B AMG sedan is the "little" CLA45, I has a two liter turbo four rated at 355 hp. That's 135 more than my old SVO Mustang's turbo 2.3, which was pretty hot snot in '86! Considerations for; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00129.html (10,819 bytes)
12. Re: [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: Cullen McCann <cmccann1972@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 09:12:36 -0500; Mayf, I am not well versed but I have seen BIG power made out of the gm "ecotec" that was around a couple of decades ago. I dont know if a non-ford motor is even an idea. BLASPHEMY! ;) They are a var; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00130.html (12,336 bytes)
13. Re: [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: Larry Mayfield <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 07:26:14 -0700; Ok, folk. Somehow it seems that the note that the next generation of motor(s) for the salt flats car has to be all motor. That means no blowers, no turbos, no NOS, just motor. Can be a really high te; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00132.html (10,957 bytes)
14. Re: [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: "Mark Rense" <mark44124@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 11:37:12 -0400; Dr Mayf, How about listing ALL the class restrictions? - max number of cylinders allowed - max number valves per cylinder - cam shaft configuration limitations (OHV, OHC, DOHC, L-head, pocket valve)?; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00133.html (11,767 bytes)
15. Re: [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: Larry Mayfield <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 09:52:42 -0700; Ok, the basic restrictions to engines are: 1. Motors are blown, unblown This next genb is UNBLOWN 2. Fuels are either Fuel, ie nitometnhane, alcohol, NOS, gasoline Propane, electrical... NExt gen mot; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00134.html (14,683 bytes)
16. Re: [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: CoolVT@aol.com; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 13:00:41 -0400 (EDT); Mayf, If you're thinking of putting this proposed engine into a Sunbeam car I'll help by throwing in a few bucks for the cause. Mark L Ok, the basic restrictions to engines are: 1. Motors are blown,; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00135.html (9,492 bytes)
17. Re: [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: Jay Laifman <jay.laifman@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 10:03:09 -0700; As I understand it, the 2 liter overhead cam engine in the Pinto and Capri was really a German designed engine for higher revs, and the 2.3 liter was based on a pick up truck engine, and that it was; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00136.html (11,102 bytes)
18. Re: [Tigers] Thinking Ahead... (score: 1): Author: Jay Laifman <jay.laifman@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 10:05:24 -0700; I might add that the S2000 is routinely raced. And it has been a top winner in SCCA Autocross for years. So, there should be lots of resources out there for performance mods and racing upgrades. elec; /html/tigers/2013-07/msg00137.html (15,239 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]