- 1. Re: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 6, Issue 276 (score: 1)
- Author: Tod Brown <todbrown@roadrunner.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 01:14:42 -0500
- There is some consistent confusion about this car and a couple of specific errors in this piece. First, there were, indeed, as everyone knows, two prototypes. However, only one made the trip to the f
- /html/tigers/2014-12/msg00016.html (12,758 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 6, Issue 276 (score: 1)
- Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:28:17 -0500
- Tod There will always be confusion within the subject until we in the Rootes community seek out the confusion and make corrections. I find that writing articles without confusion is difficult for me.
- /html/tigers/2014-12/msg00017.html (10,809 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 6, Issue 276 (score: 1)
- Author: Tod Brown <todbrown@roadrunner.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:16:54 -0500
- Ron: I would agree with what you have said. My point is that the advertised hp for the Tiger 260 (for right or wrong) was 164 hp, not 166 as quoted in the article. Your figure of 180 is probably clos
- /html/tigers/2014-12/msg00018.html (12,131 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 6, Issue 276 (score: 1)
- Author: Gary Winblad <garywinblad@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 17:23:33 +0000 (UTC)
- Ron, Very interesting.. Being involved with Tigers since 1971, I have never seen that info before! What do you think the "net" rating would be? Oh, excellent writing. Gary Tod There will always be co
- /html/tigers/2014-12/msg00019.html (12,207 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu