I'd go the Rat-Co (http://www.rat-co.com/index.html) route if I was
replacing my frame and had the money. The advantages are many...... ranging
from all new steel to known weak areas being reinforced to having it built
with the options your want. If you buy a used frame, no matter how good it
looks, you somehow need to see what's really under the tee-shirt and the
inside condition of the TA mount points. There's lots of pictures in the
6-Pack Forum of frames that looked real good until they "dug" into the
places you can't see.
Bob Danielson
1975 TR6 CF38503U
Running w/ Throttle Body Injection,
Toyota 5 speed & Nissan LSD
http://tr6.danielsonfamily.org
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Douglas Morris" <dcmdcm@nc.rr.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 11:04 PM
To: "6pack" <6pack@autox.team.net>
Subject: [6pack] Chassis / frame source
> Wellp, I've been avoiding the issue for years, but I'm going to have to
> replace the chassis on me ol' '74 TR-6. It's just getting too flimsy (you
> know, deadly).
> Yep, that's right, the PO's frame repairs actually fall into the category:
> cosmetic.
>
> What's the current recommendation for a source for a non-competition,
> driver-quality chassis frame?
>
> Doug Morris, NC, '74 TR-6 CF-18xxx
> .
> _______________________________________________
>
> 6pack@autox.team.net
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage:
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/6pack/75tr6@tr6.danielsonfamily.org
_______________________________________________
6pack@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
|