autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: H stock Type R - Why Not? :-)

To: autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: H stock Type R - Why Not? :-)
From: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 14:24:55 -0700
BRUBEL51@aol.com wrote:

> Well, I guess the jury is back on the Type R being the dominant car by far in
> the class, a 1 , 2 , 3 finish  is enough to convince those that do compete in
> this class that either we have an "R"  or we buy one.. I would think that by
> performance alone the car won by 1.4 seconds over all other non 'R' cars.
> Well, it does not take a genius to know that just by looking at the car and
> its attributes  the "R" is not a G car.

On these two days, on these two courses, the Type R won - this time.

All courses are not the National courses, nor the Nationals surface (thank
God!).

Classing should not be based totally on how things go at only the Nationals,
since most Soloists never make it there. The sport is for everyone, not just
those who can go to the Nationals.

The Eclipse was about 7 tenths out each day - this time.

The Prelude V-Tech was only 3 tenths out day one.

Some new cars that seem to fit this class profile are on the horizon.

Review all of the results from other areas, paying special attention to
Divisionals and National Tours for a better picture.

Side Note - I'm still amazed over the H Stock times.  Heck, the Type R would
have won H stock by only 2 tenths - maybe we should move the Type R to H Stock?
:-)

Scott Meyers
Still haven't seen it all.......



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>