I have never seen a ruling that has ever HURT a single SEB member in the
interest of the masses, have you??
The one nearest to my heart was the merging of AP and FP while Karen Babb
(then AP) was a member, something that has been fought by those from the old
FP ever since. Can only think of a couple people THAT
decision benefitted, guess who those people were?? This is not the only
example, just the one most prominent in my individual solo career!
Maybe I am jaded and frustrated too, Rob.
G
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Robert Glover <rob@f-body.org> wrote:
> I may sound jaded or frustrated or what, but I seriously doubt that the
> SEB will make any rule changes that don't suit them. It really doesn't
> matter what the people want; it's all a matter of what they feel like
> doing.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Phil Osborne <posborne@minuteman-ups.com> replied:
> And on what basis do you share this opinion? Have you been denied a
> particular request?
> What makes you or anyone else think the SEB can please everyone? Just >
look at some of the suggestions that have been posted on this list in the
> past 90 days, and tell me if you think all of them, one of them, or none
of
> them should be considered. How many of them have actually been
> submitted to the SEB? What could the SEB possibly stand to gain by
> making rules based on what THEY want?
> I really wish folks would think before making such broad-based and
> baseless statements...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|