autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: OSP and catch-all classes

To: <dg50@daimlerchrysler.com>, <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: OSP and catch-all classes
From: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 10:30:26 -0700
> And I have to agree too. My only serious cheeze-off this year about the
> whole SM experience was the number of regions that actively discouraged
> people from trying to run SM. Regions that have an OSP or OSP-like class
> have a better excuse than those that don't. (So it's hard to get mad at the
> San Fransisco folks, who had OSP for a loooong time. I can understand their
> reluctance to split their existing class into SM and non-SM-legal-OSP)

SFR supported both SM and SM-Rookie classes all season long, as well as our OSP
class.  OSP averaged 17 entrants, SM averaged 7 per event.  Please keep the
facts straight.

KeS

http://www.sfrscca.org/solo2/Results/2000/index.html


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>