>In the SM case, you're explicitly requiring a street registration, which
>(by federal law) requires a cat. However, you're allowing folks to run
>without cats, implicitly encouraging them to break the law.
when I get busted by the Feds for having no cat in my SM car, you're saying
I could tell them I was encouraged by the SCCA to run without a cat to be
competitive in SM, making the SCCA is also liable for my offense and the
$25K fine. I don't think so!
PS - I don't have an SM car. My mediocre driving and bone stock car will
stay in G-Stock. I am just commenting on something that has nothing to do
with me :-)
jmb
|