ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: pointless auto topic #38: short vs swoopy line

To: OSP13@attglobal.net
Subject: Re: pointless auto topic #38: short vs swoopy line
From: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 03:05:43 EST
In a message dated 12/8/01 6:39:33 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
OSP13@attglobal.net writes:


> So you could have protested your usually fine course design under the
> design rule which says that a Solo II event shall  be a test of
> 

Nope.  It says (section 1.2.3) "The course is generally well enough defined 
so that memory is not required to remain on course."  It doesn't say anything 
about memory not being required to stay on the fastest line...  If that were 
the case, you could protest any event.  :-)

Charlie

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>