| To: | "datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net" <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 1600 and 2000 Differences |
| From: | Gordon Glasgow <glasgow@serv.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Jul 2000 13:47:08 -0700 |
The 1600's used a 3.89:1 rear end while the 2000's had a 3.700:1. Michael Tarelka wrote: > Dear Knowledgeable Group: > > Are the only differences between a 1600 and 2000, the size of engine and > transmission? > > Thanks in advance for your input > > Michael Tarelka > Alameda, CA -- Gordon Glasgow http://www.gordon-glasgow.org |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: BTW, Davesmbox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Thanks, Hall, Phillip |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 1600 and 2000 Differences, R Haug |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 1600 and 2000 Differences, Dat2000srl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |